World Harmony Through Panarchy

globefront

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
9
Putting aside that World Peace will never be a possibility because negativity will always exist, would the concept of World Harmony still be potential? Balance can often be a synonym of Harmony depending on the topic of discussion. Harmony is the free flowing of all things together, which would actually also include the free flow of negativity and positivity together in one place shared, much like the flux between good and evil. More so, it appears that the whole notion of harmony resides in the practice of tolerance of all kinds of diversities. Diversity is much more than race or ethnicity, for what we have today is a very alive and aggressive intolerance and bigotry of ideas.

Why must there be limitations put on the scope and reach of all tolerance? If we think in terms of harmony rather than peace or total non-violence, than wouldn’t tolerance be the foundation for which we build this world harmony between all natural forces?

The post-intolerance age is far from being reached, even though great strides in racial or ethnic differences have been made. What Panarchy offers is of a type of freedom that few people realize is actually available to them intellectually. Its simple message of tolerance is by far the most unthreatening concept since it has no nationalist agenda, religious confinements, territorial entanglements, or calls to end anything other than all intolerance itself. Panarchy is the allowance of all competing jurisdictions, nations, ideas, races and ethnicities in one place - and the consequential freedom of choice of world citizens to choose which systems they wish to live under according to their needs.

Why can we not apply the concepts of free market capitalism to competing ideological jurisdictions based on the services that they provide citizens of the world and then let all people decide for themselves which system they wish to “buy” into? Similarity, would we ever respect our government forcing us to buy only one brand of cereal and make all other’s illegal? If we are not allowed to choose the social, political or environmental society we truly want to live under based on our own personal desires, than how will humanity ever know which system(s) work best for its forward development?

If Panarchy were an ideal strived for by the major world powers, its liberating principles would supersede anything achieved by the Bill of Rights or even the most common Anarchist doctrines that boast its voluntary lifestyle yet wish to stop the formation of any state. Panarchy allows for all experimental and established system or non-systems to exist together; and for citizens of the participating groups in this Panarchy to choose freely how they wish to develop socially, politically, and environmentally.

Where these two very conflicting aspects of mankind can coexist together in harmony and tolerance of one another’s existence is what will eventually allow for the exponential growth by the most justifiable means of allowing for free Choice. Choice is what separates human beings from cogs in a machine, and Panarchy offers all people of all backgrounds the most choices possible for their forward development and tolerance of their differences…

Perhaps we may not agree on the interpretation of what world harmony is entirely; but in order to achieve a state of world harmony as described earlier a profound understanding and slow application of Panarchy in all social, environmental and political spectrums of global society is the only foreseeable way. Tolerance of all things that tolerate each other is the ultimate justice for a conflicted humanity. We will never eradicate negativity and misfortune; these things are part of the natural development of each individual. But what can actually be achieved is a level of intellectual evolution, enough to the point where we can see social and political acceptance taken to new levels…

I know that this idea/thread will be shunned by the inquisition here, but try to look passed its impossibility and rather look at it in absolute terms as we do all philosophical debates…
 
Werbung:
Back
Top