4 years, 2 months 10 plus days...and we finally get a ruling

ASPCA4EVER

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
2,555
Location
Land of the JAYHAWKS-ROCK CHOCK Jayhawk, KU
Katrina negligence ruling could cost feds

Judge’s decision should give thousands a better shot at claiming damages

091118-KatrinaFlood-hmed-618p.h2.jpg

Mario Tama / Getty Images file
Ira Jackson pulls his boat through a flooded street Sept. 5, 2005 in New Orleans, a week after Hurricane Katrina hit.

APTRANS.gif

updated 56 minutes ago

NEW ORLEANS - The federal government could be vulnerable to billions of dollars in claims after a judge ruled that the Army Corps of Engineers' failure to properly maintain a navigation channel led to massive flooding in Hurricane Katrina.
U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval on Wednesday awarded seven plaintiffs $720,000, but the government could eventually be forced to pay much more. The ruling should give more than 100,000 other individuals, businesses and government entities a better shot at claiming damages.
Duval sided with six residents and one business who argued the Army Corps' shoddy oversight of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet led to the flooding of New Orleans' Lower 9th Ward and neighboring St. Bernard Parish. He said, however, the corps couldn't be held liable for the flooding of eastern New Orleans, where two of the plaintiffs lived.

'Monumental negligence'
The ruling is also emotionally resonant for south Louisiana. Many in New Orleans have argued that the flooding in the aftermath of Katrina, which struck the region Aug. 29, 2005, was a manmade disaster caused by the Army Corps' failure to maintain the levee system protecting the city.
"Total devastation could possibly have been avoided if something had been done," said Tanya Smith, one of the plaintiffs. "A lot of this stuff was preventable and they turned a deaf ear to it."
<<for the rest of this story>>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34028940/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts

*****************************************
4 years, 2 months 10 plus days...and we finally get a ruling...hmmm?

Now, what...does anyone think that they will get their money that the adjudication will be completely adhered too? I'm thinking...highly unlikely for any of the litigants to receive any financial award;)
 
Werbung:
Back
Top