And so the Democrat Party's house of cards slowly begins to crumble

Little-Acorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
Location
San Diego, CA
At the Presidential debate last night, we saw the first example of what happens when a knowledgable conservative confronts a Democrat used to exaggeration, fibs, and "gotcha" politics, without that Democrat's being able to rely on his party's usual backing by spin artists and a compliant media willing to overlook his problems, mistakes, and past record of failure.

Mitt Romney repeatedly pressed Obama on the results of his policies, expressed honest incredulity at the extremes of failure that have been let go and rationalized by so many, and did a very good job of presenting contrasting ideas of how things should be handled instead... and why.

And Obama was left with nothing but tired denials, repetition of his party's long-debunked lies about Romney, and the same empty assurances that things would get better if we gave him another chance.

The contrast between the two was striking. There hasn't been a more stark display of Democrat dispiritedness, and Republican enthusiasm and determination, than at the Presidential debate last night.

Funniest part was seeing the liberals in the various networks afterward, falling all over themselves trying to express "surprise" that Romney wasn't the stiff, boring figurehead they had insisted he was supposed to be... as though their wishing it were so had made it true.

It got so bad afterward, that I heard one older lady haughtily inform us that the $716 billion Obama was cutting out of Medicare, was NOT a cut... it was merely a slight reduction in the planned rate of increase over ten years!

And this after Democrats had been screaming literally for years that Republicans' attempts to slow down the rate of increase in government spending (with never a word about actually spending less next year than we did this year), amounted to "draconian cuts" that would do such grave harm to seniors, the middle class, and the chillun!

Last night was a revelation. I can't help but think that Obama will do better in the NEXT debate, after falling flat on his face in this one. He MUST.

But what, exactly, can he change to make his performance better? The facts will be no different, his record for the last four years will be no better next week, the deficits will be no smaller, our Ambassador to Libya won't be brought back to life by the next debate, the middle Eastern riots won't be any less virulent, and people won't want Obamacare any more next debate than they did during this one.

The Democrats have been making their bed for the last four years, ably assisted and masked by a huge, compliant media. But at these debates, the media is stripped away. Cutter isn't allowed to speak, and the CBS, ABC, NBC and CNN commentators must remain silent while Romney points out what has actually been going on and describes what should be done from now on, and why.

Democrats have built a house of cards, from wishful-thinking plans of socialist nirvana; denigration of people who work hard, take chances, and succeed; and quietly sweeping under the rug the actual results of their policies.

And last night, that house of cards finally began to collapse.

And I don't see what changes can be made by the Democrats in the next few weeks before Nov. 6, to keep the trend from accelerating.
 
Werbung:
Obama is out this morning campaigning and repeating the same lies about Romney that Romney shot down last night. Dems won't let facts get in their way and their supporters will lap it up.
 
As I said, it's all they have.

A friend of mine said that he heard MSNBC's newsroom must have looked like Jonestown, with all the empty Kool-aid cups and bloated dead bodies scattered around.
 
Romney isnt a bad candidate. He just need to challege Obama like he did last nite. The Next debate Romney should tell Obama this about Forgein policy..
You did get Bin laden and i congradulate you. But IRAN and North Korea are still very dangerous we need to confront them instead of apologizing to them. You dont understand the middle east and you say you can relate to them but you really cant,,just like you said you understood them 3 years ago. Just like they turn on us and killed 4 of our embassy members. We need to stop bowing down to china and start standing up to them.
 
Romney likes to be under-rated and dismissed.
Study his business style.

He knows what he is doing.
He's a sly dog.
He is playing with the mainstream media and letting them climb their own gibbet.
 
Romney likes to be under-rated and dismissed.
Study his business style.

He knows what he is doing.
He's a sly dog.
He is playing with the mainstream media and letting them climb their own gibbet.

None of this means he would be a good President.
 
None of this means he would be a good President.

A dachshund would make a better president than what we have now.
No place to go but up.

The best presidents would logically be the best managers who can find the best people to delegate to.
Not a job that needs a smart-ass or a cheerleader.
An efficient manager who can assess what his minions are doing and make adjustments constantly.
Shit-can those who are not making it.
Move the chess players around the board.
Main job--foreign policy where you need someone with basic good sense.

And someone who's wife is not ashamed of this country
--a woman who ought to go to the airport--leave--and never return.
 
The history of mankind is full of beancounters and administrators who never believed in individual freedom. I think being a good President and being a good beancounter are mutually exclusive traits.
 
Romney has a great chance to become another Ronald Reagan.

Yes--I agree.
Principally, because he is not a pervert or birdbrain like recent democrat presidents.
He seems to be a regular guy, not flashy--with good business acumen and he is a Patriot.
He has raised 5 boys--not an easy task.
That's all it really takes.
He also is not a Washington politician/insider--and is not beholden to any of that disgusting crowd.
I hope he is elected--with 535 new faces in Congress.
 
None of this means he would be a good President.
The history of mankind is full of beancounters and administrators who never believed in individual freedom. I think being a good President and being a good beancounter are mutually exclusive traits.

Romney is a leader more than a bean counter. Does he have command of the details ? You bet because you cannot lead if the people believe you are not smart enough to know when they're lying.

The guy gets things done and always has.
 
Romney is a leader more than a bean counter. Does he have command of the details ? You bet because you cannot lead if the people believe you are not smart enough to know when they're lying.

The guy gets things done and always has.

I should rephrase. History is full of great administrators and leaders who in my opinion wouldn't be good for the country. I don't trust Romney, I don't believe that he believes most of what he says, and I think a lot of Republican voters are going to be seriously disappointed by a Romney administration if it ever happens.
 
Werbung:
Romney is a progressive. So, tell me again how he will be a good president?

I will vote for him not because I like him, but because BO is much much worse...

249532_411352858920205_1706474089_n.jpg
 
Back
Top