1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Any CSI fans (?)

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Debates' started by n0spam4me, May 3, 2007.

  1. n0spam4me

    n0spam4me Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I'm not a total TV freak, but at least I know what CSI is.
    I bring up CSI in reference to evidence supression.
    Any time there is an effort to hide anything, that is suppress evidence,
    this sets off alarms with the investigators. Ok, who has something to hide and why?

    I point this out, because the Bush administration is guilty of THEFT of video tape from the Virginia DOT. WHY would they hide a video recording of a Boeing 757 on its way to crash into the PENTAGON? unless maybe it was NOT a Boeing 757?

    Hey look there, its the Emperor in his birthday suit!
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. Dave

    Dave New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Pherhaps you would like to enlighten us all on how something other than a 757 can hit the Pentagon within plain sight of one of the busiest sections of interstate in America, just a stones throw away from a huge airport, and still have hundreds of eye witness reports come in that it actually is a 757.
     
  3. he raises a FINE POINT if theyve Nothing to hide............
    just release the tapes? simple end of story.........but they continue to hide the tapes?
     
  4. Dave

    Dave New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The tapes that they have released have only confirmed everything they are saying.
     
  5. really? so your telling me you see a 757 in the released tapes?I find that very telling
     
  6. Dave

    Dave New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think that the video from the Pentagon shows a big white blur, which is just what one would expect to appear on a video with the frame rate of the one that was filming the impact. Just exactly what video is the government withholding that you think would prove anything?

    If you really want to know why the government took the video in the first place, keep in mind that the government was building a criminal case at the time. Once the government charged and convicted Moussaoui, they released the Pentagon video. If they hadn't done so, Moussaoui would have had a legitimate appeal that the jury pool had been tainted.
     
  7. Sorry pal I dont buy what your selling .......technology isnt stuck in 1970


    like i said they have a multitude of tapes none of which has been released

    they are concealing something or they would simply put an end to it with actual proof beyond a white blur as you claim to see
     
  8. Dave

    Dave New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, a ton of tapes have been released. Do a little research on the subject. What do you claim to see in the Pentagon video? Or I should ask, what do you think should be visible of an object traveling over 500MPH with a security camera with a poor framerate? These cameras aren't designed to get a quality view of something traveling that fast. Not many cameras in the world are, and even fewer cameras marketed for security purposes are.
     
  9. as i stated Im not Buying what your selling

    ive seen all the pentagon tapes Im not convinced sorry
     
  10. vyo476

    vyo476 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    You're not buying the facts? That an object moving at 500 mph hit the Pentagon? That the cameras that captured images of it happening have very poor frame rates? That cameras that are designed to capture video of things moving that fast aren't used for security purposes? What exactly is it that you "aren't buying"?
     
  11. r0beph

    r0beph New Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2007
    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville, Alabama
    I think he spent all his money on foil for his hat. Couldn't afford any facts after that splurge... :-\

    That being said, negative proof annoys me...a lot. You can't prove something by inference when absolutely no proof exists. Especially when proof otherwise exists that you discount with a plethora of ways that no scientist would consider.
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. vyo476

    vyo476 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    And you know this how...? A link to the evidence would be nice.
     
  13. I never stated i had any proof of anything? i said i dont buy his views.pretty simple I hate inferrance too

    kettle meet pot
     
  14. do your own homework thanks
     
  15. Dave

    Dave New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The burden of proof lies with you making the claim. If there are more tapes that haven't been released, prove it.
     
Loading...

Share This Page