Well, there you go...more opinion and not the first shred of actual observed, measured, quantified data. Well, lucky for us, at least one of us is interested in science and not the cultish worship of pseudoscience.
Your article begins with a bald faced lie...a demonstrable bald faced lie.
Average US temperatures have risen dramatically and fast, with recent decades the warmest of the past 1,500 years, according to a draft federal government report cited by The New York Times on Tuesday.
This statement is quite simply false and can be proven to be false.
Back in the earliest years of the 21st century, a system went on line, designed and placed by NOAA. It is called the USCRN. That is the United States Climate Reference Network. It consists of triple redundant, temperature data stations that are so pristinely placed, that the data requires no adjustment. There is no possibility of the urban heat island effect having any influence on the temperatures taken..and being triple redundant, it never misses a thing.
Here is a graph of the temperatures of the US for the decade ending in 2015.
For obvious reasons, data from the USCRN doesn't show up in the news, and the sources you apparently visit would avoid the data like vampires avoid the sun. The fact is that the US has been in a cooling phase since the CRN went on line. Your opinion piece is a lie and since despite your claims, you aren't really interested in actual evidence, you have been left believing a lie.
Your report says that Americans are feeling the effects of this temperature increase...what effects might those be? The ones that they are told to feel?...the ones that are just made up for press releases? The emperor is naked no matter how beautiful you think his new clothes are.
They claim that how much more the climate changes will depend on emissions...that is a claim...do you have a single shred of observed, measured, quantified data that demonstrates that additional CO2 will cause the atmosphere to warm? Any at all, because I have been looking for decades and can't find it. Plenty of assumptions....plenty of claims....plenty of logical fallacies supporting the claim, but actual data?....not the first piece.
The gist of your "evidence" was that they are pissed at Trump for pulling out of the Paris accord. And this sort of milquetoast pap is what passes for evidence in your mind? No wonder you have been so thoroughly duped, and little wonder at all that you play the part of useful idiot passing the steaming piles of bullshit that pass for evidence in your mind on to others at every opportunity. You wouldn't recognize the scientific method if it bit you right on the ass.