read
and why not ? no one can be shocked at his reversal on this , reversals are pretty common with him especially when it comes to money. and more to the point, whats fair for the goose is fair for the gander.
what I'm scratching my head over is this...
this seems a lot like the campaign is coordinating with the superpac which is not permitted.
the author seems to be wondering too
this I find interesting though
he didn't seem to object that the unions were given unequal treatment in terms of campaign finance, but thats water over the dam.
and why not ? no one can be shocked at his reversal on this , reversals are pretty common with him especially when it comes to money. and more to the point, whats fair for the goose is fair for the gander.
what I'm scratching my head over is this...
Aides said the president had signed off on a plan to dispatch cabinet officials, senior advisers at the White House and top campaign staff members to deliver speeches on behalf of Mr. Obama at fund-raising events for Priorities USA Action
this seems a lot like the campaign is coordinating with the superpac which is not permitted.
the author seems to be wondering too
The decision, which comes nine months before Election Day, escalates the money wars and is a milestone in Mr. Obama’s evolving stances on political fund-raising. The lines have increasingly blurred between presidential campaigns and super PACs, which have flourished since a 2010 Supreme Court ruling and other legal and regulatory decisions made it easier for outside groups to raise unlimited donations to promote candidates.
this I find interesting though
“We’re not going to fight this fight with one hand tied behind our back,” Jim Messina, the manager of Mr. Obama’s re-election campaign, said in an interview. “With so much at stake, we can’t allow for two sets of rules. Democrats can’t be unilaterally disarmed.”
he didn't seem to object that the unions were given unequal treatment in terms of campaign finance, but thats water over the dam.