I was never in favor of this war in the first place, as I have said countless times. The Iraqi people were never worth dying for, because they do not share our values. That's not even to say that our values are better; but the differences between them are irreconcilable, so why even bother. I couldn't have cared less if Saddam had stayed in power. We overthrew King George on our own, and they can overthrow Saddam on their own - or not, but that should have been up to them, and what they were willing to die for. So far, it's only us chomping at the bit to die for democracy, and that's not enough. Moreover, their democracy, if they ever achieve it, is going to look exactly like Iran's. Ahmadinejad was elected, and, soon, the Iraqis will have someone in power just like him. We would be far better off if we spent all that money rounding up the Muslims in this country and shipping them back to allah-land, since their only reason for being here is to turn this country into yet another Islamic theocracy. And don't bother trying to accuse the right-wing Christians of trying to do the same thing, because a) even American Christians would not let that happen, which is the second-biggest distinction between the Muslims and Christians, and b) no matter how much you might hate Christians, you really don't want an Islamic theocracy, trust me.
As for you, if your pal Bill Clinton had gone into Iraq, you would be praising him. Where were you when Clinton was carpet-bombing the Serbs? Your think that intervention was any more "moral" than what we're doing in Iraq? Of course it wasn't, but I don't remember any of you so-called "anti-war" liberals complaining about that. And the reason is that Clinton was bombing European Christians, and that's ok with you.
So, don't play games with me. You don't want peace. I want peace. You just want to cast your lot with the Muslims. Well, do us all a favor and go live in Saudi Arabia. That would raise the average IQ of both countries.
regards
doug