Long history of corruption and green influencing flawed government policies like the modern climate change agenda

[mark francis]

It's always about greed, corruption, and money, when all the hype and fluff is removed.

2 Convicted in Plot to Tamper with NOAA Climate-Gauges Devices - Was This Fraudulent Data Used? | The Gateway Pundit | by Michael Schwarz, The Western Journal 3-11-24

2 Convicted in Plot to Tamper with NOAA Climate-Gauges Devices – Was This Fraudulent Data Used?

 

[Boris Norris]

It's always about greed, corruption, and money, when all the hype and fluff is removed.

2 Convicted in Plot to Tamper with NOAA Climate-Gauges Devices - Was This Fraudulent Data Used? | The Gateway Pundit | by Michael Schwarz, The Western Journal 3-11-24

2 Convicted in Plot to Tamper with NOAA Climate-Gauges Devices – Was This Fraudulent Data Used?

Oops. You mustn't have read this. You're paranoid about climate change.

It wasn’t clear if the fraudulent data was used for “climate change” record-keeping, but the case definitely raises the question.

ADVERTISEMENT

Esch and Jagers, however, appear to have had no interest in larger climate-related questions. In fact, they allegedly acted from personal interests alone, motivated by age-old temptations to dishonesty and greed.

Along with unnamed conspirators, Esch and Jagers tampered with rain gauges in order to commit insurance fraud.

According to CBS Newqs, the U.S. Department of Agriculture subsidizes private crop insurance through the Rainfall Index Annual Forage Insurance Plan.

Maybe you should proof read items first.

 

[pjmret]

Yes greed by Colorado farmers who historically skew republican
Nothing to do with climate change lol

 

[mark francis]

Yes greed by Colorado farmers who historically skew republican
Nothing to do with climate change lol

There are two sides to the modern climate change debate:

1. The radical leftist alarmism exploited for purposes totally unrelated to any real fears of climate change disasters; and
2. The sensible scientific studied approach that is mocked by rubes and crooks due to their greed or ignorance.

 

[Boris Norris]

There are two sides to the modern climate change debate:

1. The radical leftist alarmism exploited for purposes totally unrelated to any real fears of climate change disasters; and
2. The sensible scientific studied approach that is mocked by rubes and crooks due to their greed or ignorance.

The science has proven there is climate change. Thanks for seeing the light Donny.

 

[pjmret]

There are two sides to the modern climate change debate:

1. The radical leftist alarmism exploited for purposes totally unrelated to any real fears of climate change disasters; and
2. The sensible scientific studied approach that is mocked by rubes and crooks due to their greed or ignorance.

Nope lol
Right wing blather

 

[Phoenix68]

The Western Journal 3-11-24

.

.
"The WESTERN JOURNAL?????"
.​

 

[mark francis]

The science has proven there is climate change. Thanks for seeing the light Donny.

Not true. Biased scientists modified the data to fit their agenda-driven narratives, but unbiased scientists exposed their fraud.

 

[Boris Norris]

Not true. Biased scientists modified the data to fit their agenda-driven narratives, but unbiased scientists exposed their fraud.

You can't prove it's not true.

 

[mark francis]

You can't prove it's not true.

Global warming alarmism is based on global warming false doctrine mythology and superstition.

 

[pjmret]

Global warming alarmism is based on global warming false doctrine mythology and superstition.

Right wing blather lol