What's your opinion of the individual parts of Trump's Digital Bill of Rights?

Yo Daddy!

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2022
Messages
1,933
The questions below reflect what Trump said * he will do in a 2nd POTUS term.

* In his 12/15/22 Digital Bill of Rights announcement.

Please Answer This Question:

Should Trump dismantle the government systems that facilitate censorship?
 
Werbung:
The questions below reflect what Trump said * he will do in a 2nd POTUS term.

* In his 12/15/22 Digital Bill of Rights announcement.

Please Answer This Question:

Should Trump dismantle the government systems that facilitate censorship?

Grow up. You've been barking this rubbish like it will change the world when no one gives a shit. Who cares what you zombies think? Trump will never be POTUS again.
 
Trump wants to protect our rights from being stolen and abused.

You want your freedoms raped?
 
T

TRump wanted a dictatorship and we know where that ended.
You do go on with rubbish.
Every single time when Trump MIGHT have had a chance to advance a dictatorial agenda, he always chose options and made decisions which supported or maintained or strengthened our Representative Democracy and his job and the very role of PRESIDENT OF THIS REPUBLICAN DEMOCRATIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT.
 
Every single time when Trump MIGHT have had a chance to advance a dictatorial agenda, he always chose options and made decisions which supported or maintained or strengthened our Representative Democracy and his job and the very role of PRESIDENT OF THIS REPUBLICAN DEMOCRATIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT.
You're a complete dickhead. Do you really believe the j6 was about keeping democracy?
You're brain dead son.
 
Werbung:
what "government system", exactly, "facilitates" "censorship"?

what "rights" have been "stolen" and "abused"?, exactly?

surely you aren't stupid enough to think that a private company running itself like it wants to is "government censorship"? maybe you are that stupid. lol.

are you stupid enough to think that trump has a right to a twitter account? is that somewhere in the constitution? did the founding fathers talk about social media? lol

this is just more pandering by butt hurt trump to right wing morons like you.

btw, he's just being his usual hypocritical lying self:

Former President Donald Trump’s social media platform Truth Social engages in inexplicable censorship of both conservative and liberal viewpoints, according to a Public Citizen report released in August. Despite being marketed as an uncensored platform for free speech, the site is governed by heavy-handed terms of service that are more restrictive than any similar platform, the report found.

“Truth Social is far from the haven of free speech that Trump promised, as even conservative viewpoints and links have been shadow-banned,” said Cheyenne Hunt-Majer, a lobbyist with Public Citizen and author of the report. “It’s not at all clear how Truth Social determines which content will be labled as sensitive, why some content is censored after it’s posted, and why other content seems to be preemptively blocked from appearing on the platform at all.”

Hunt-Majer set up an account on Truth Social and documented numerous instances of shadow-banned content firsthand. A shadow ban fully or partially blocks a user’s content without warning, notice, or recourse. Banned content included:

  • Coverage of the January 6th Committee hearings;
  • Pro-choice opinions;
  • Pro-gun messages by country music star Blake Shelton;
  • Criticism of U.S. support for Ukraine; and
  • Links to far-right website Breitbart.
In some instances, posted content did not appear on the site for days or ever. And in one case, Hunt-Majer’s viral video highlighting the absurdity of Truth Social’s censorship appears to have triggered a change of heart among site moderators regarding the phrase “abortion is healthcare.”

The report found that Truth Social’s content moderation practices lack the transparency, consistency, or nuance typical of major social media platforms. Unlike Twitter, Truth Social bans all sexual content and explicit language. Its terms of service also allow moderators to ban anyone whose content is deemed “libelous, slanderous, or otherwise objectionable.”
 
Back
Top