85 percent of the American population opposed to a war against Iran

.
I think it's more a matter of....we DON'T need another Chickenhawk "proving" himself, in Iran....this time!!!!
.
View attachment 28932
.
"One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief. My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of (Kuwait) and he wasted it.
.
If
I have a chance to invade Iraq, if I had that much capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed I want to get passed and I'm going to have a successful presidency."
.
.
Preeident GW Bush first told Saddam to leave. When he refused, our military invaded and wiped him off the map very fast. Saddam's American lovers howled of course.

 
Werbung:
Obama had friends and colleagues with close ties to Iran, and he is rumored to have released billions of dollars to Iran in hopes of encouraging the nation to turn from terrorism to peace.
This is a total lie. All this warmongering against Iran is coming from genocidal terrorist Israelis, led by the criminal Netanyahu.
 
This is a total lie. All this warmongering against Iran is coming from genocidal terrorist Israelis, led by the criminal Netanyahu.



Washington Free Beacon

Washington Free Beacon


National Security

Disclosed: How Obama Administration Officials Conducted Shadow Diplomacy With Iran To Undermine Trump

kerry-snitch-1-736x493.jpg
Former Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and John Kerry (Don Emmert/AFP via Getty Images)
Adam Kredo
May 26, 2022
http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u...hadow-diplomacy-with-iran-to-undermine-trump/
https://twitter.com/share?url=https...Shadow+Diplomacy+With+Iran+To+Undermine+Trump


Senior Obama administration officials engaged in a secret meeting with Iran in 2018 as part of an effort to undermine the Trump administration's diplomatic push to isolate the hardline regime, according to an internal State Department document.
 
Shitshizpants is a corrupt rapey incompetent old geezer. Undermining him is an act of supreme patriotism.
Sumbitch belongs in prison.
 
Shitshizpants is a corrupt rapey incompetent old geezer. Undermining him is an act of supreme patriotism.
Sumbitch belongs in prison.
Democrats must not oppose rape since they refuse to even investigate accused democrat presidents for their alleged rapes. In her early years as an Alinsky devotee Hillary defended a child rapist and laughed when she got him off.
 
Trump is the rapist that they need to examine first. He is pissing way billions on a useless war that he seems to be losing. When you visit your next gas pump, you will all know that it was because Shitshizpants was taking orders from Netanyahu.

Bastard Shithizpants needs to be removed and incarcerated NOW>
 
Trump is the rapist that they need to examine first. He is pissing way billions on a useless war that he seems to be losing. When you visit your next gas pump, you will all know that it was because Shitshizpants was taking orders from Netanyahu.

Bastard Shithizpants needs to be removed and incarcerated NOW>
Leftist basturds keep falsely accusing Trump of crimes commonly committed by democrats with leftist protections from prosecution.
 
What is it about Iran that you love so much?

strawman logical fallacy

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man"), instead of the opponent's proposition. Straw man arguments have been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly regarding highly charged emotional subjects.

do better

comrade stalin
 
Werbung:
strawman logical fallacy

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man"), instead of the opponent's proposition. Straw man arguments have been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly regarding highly charged emotional subjects.

do better

comrade stalin
Lefties hate the US and love enemies of the American state.

Zohran Mamdani Gets Obliterated for Siding With Iran​

 
Back
Top