First of all, why does this get away with insulting moderators all the time?
And second of all, the "9/11 was an inside job" concept is by definition a conspiracy theory, it being yet empirically unproven (and therefore only theoretical) and concerning itself with a deliberate conspiracy to inflict harm on the American people.
Why are we take the testimony of one emergency responder as definitive proof of a conspiracy? This doesn't even count as a preponderance of evidence, much less the kind of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that justifies the scorn and derision with which you react to any dissenters (which, for the record, is typical of all conspiracy theorists across all places and times).