Reply to thread

Definitely have to agree with you on this one. It may have seemed he could be dangerous, in fact a lot of things and people could be, but he had no actual reason to do anything about it until something happened. Politically, it would have looked like tyranny, and quite possibly would have made things worse than they are. It might have saved an attack on the twin towers, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't have either happened without him, or happened somewhere else to the same effect. Terrorism is rarely ever just one person, and it would have looked bad for him to do it out of nowhere. That, and the fact that there are threats made all the time that turn out to be fake. It would have had to be looked into.