A liberal on this forum claimed you can not have combustion with out oxygen

the annoying thing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Messages
13,554
Location
Florida
He also claims he was a teacher and I think he may have claimed he has a phd in something not sure about that one.
Any way I have worked for a chemical company that was a specialist in making small batch dangerous chems and meds we even mad lsd for the government at one time . I worked there until my job on the shuttle program started. I have experience with chemicals and my job on the shuttle programs was as a clean room supervisor and also I did field work on some projects at the 45 air space wing .

Hes full of bull and is wrong combustion is possible with out oxygen.
I just started a thread about it because he was using this as a example to prove there is no god for some reason. But I do enjoy proving all the lug nut types here wrong .
 
Werbung:
its amusing that you think his political background is relevant to a science question. lol
just more of your desperation
 
its amusing that you think his political background is relevant to a science question. lol
just more of your desperation
Hes like you talks a lot about science but is clueless after all you said science is 99,999 percent right and are just another liberal idiot who thinks hes smart
 
Hes like you talks a lot about science but is clueless after all you said science is 99,999 percent right and are just another liberal idiot who thinks hes smart
so mark is clueless about science too but he's a conservative. so what? politics is irrelevant to science.

you just couldn't stop from rushing here to start a stupid thread because you wanted to take a shot at an evil liberal. lol.
you're quite pathetic.
 
so mark is clueless about science too but he's a conservative. so what? politics is irrelevant to science.

you just couldn't stop from rushing here to start a stupid thread because you wanted to take a shot at an evil liberal. lol.
you're quite pathetic.
His claim not mine just like when you claimed science is right 99.999 percent of the time. And as far as marks belief in God goes I can not and you can not prove otherwise
You seem to forget Biden Pelosi Obama all believe in God also at least they claim they do and it's pretty obvious they are lying while marks belief is real .That's why you and the other liberals attack him so much .You do not like the fact he believes .
 
His claim not mine just like when you claimed science is right 99.999 percent of the time. And as far as marks belief in God goes I can not and you can not prove otherwise
You seem to forget Biden Pelosi Obama all believe in God also at least they claim they do and it's pretty obvious they are lying while marks belief is real .That's why you and the other liberals attack him so much .You do not like the fact he believes .

its not marks belief in god that makes him a science moron. its is stupidity about actual science. duh.

but again, this is a politics web site, rushing to start a thread because an "evil liberal" said something wrong about science is pathetic. lol
 
Combustion is of course a violent chemical reaction that occur when two elements or compounds combine. The most common is of course, when some element or compound combines with oxygen, but other similar reactions are possible.
 
Combustion is of course a violent chemical reaction that occur when two elements or compounds combine. The most common is of course, when some element or compound combines with oxygen, but other similar reactions are possible.
Combustion? Is that how the universe accidently invented itself? If so, who invented the elements that combined for the combustion?
 
Combustion is of course a violent chemical reaction that occur when two elements or compounds combine. The most common is of course, when some element or compound combines with oxygen, but other similar reactions are possible.
yes but you said there is no combustion with out oxygen. And obviously wrong the first time now its time to fess up and you did after admitting you were wrong again and full of shat
 
No one on earth has ever imbued that. You did.


The elements for it beginning were always there. We can now see the light from the BB and no god or heaven in between.
God rejecting rebels have no scientifically valid clue how the universe might have originated without God.
 
God rejecting rebels have no scientifically valid clue how the universe might have originated without God.
If science DID prove how it originated, you wouldn't believe it anyway because science is the graveyard of religions.
Perhaps you can detail the process how god did it.

This should be good.
 
If science DID prove how it originated, you wouldn't believe it anyway because science is the graveyard of religions.
Perhaps you can detail the process how god did it.

This should be good.
There are not enough billions of years available for dummies to spend trying in vain to discover how the universe could have been created without God.
 
Werbung:
There are not enough billions of years available for dummies to spend trying in vain to discover how the universe could have been created without God.
Again, tell us how god created it from nothing. I know you can't.
Belch another Bible passage.
 
Back
Top