Alternative Stalin Story

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
3,821
Everyone knows that Joseph Stalin was a monster who killed 65 million people !!!

Right ?

What if there is an alternative to the avalanche of propaganda that started with the Russian Revolution and
has continued ever since.

The Hoover institute is a think tank that has supplied numerous republican WarParty positions


One of Hoover's most useful assets is the historian Stephen Kotkin who has published two ,books of a projected three-part series
on joseph stalin


Stalin: Paradoxes of Power​


Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929-1941​



Each book is replete with many footnotes. I have read both.

What if some pesky contrarian check the footnotes on one of the books and discovered it was a pack of lies..

Step forward Grover Furr


In October 2017 Stephen Kotkin, professor of history at Princeton University, published "Stalin. Waiting for Hitler, 1929 – 1941." In it, Kotkin accuses Soviet leader Joseph Stalin of dozens of terrible crimes and atrocities.
The appearance of Kotkin’s scholarship is daunting: 909 pages of text, more than 5200 footnotes, and 47 pages of bibliography in tiny, triple-column type.

But Grover Furr has carefully and methodically studied every one of the hundreds of allegations of atrocity, crime, and misdeeds of any kind that Kotkin attributes to Stalin and his closest advisers.

Furr has checked every reference, every article and book, that Kotkin cites as evidence. The result: Furr has found that every single "crime" Kotkin alleges is false - a fabrication. Not a single accusation holds up.

On the evidence, Stalin committed NO crime, no atrocities – for if he had, Kotkin would surely have uncovered at least one. Furr’s exhaustive research shows that Soviet history of the 1930s, has been falsified.

Furr’s book is a model of meticulous examination of evidence and careful, objective analysis and deduction."Stalin. Waiting For … The Truth" exposes the lies and falsehoods behind Soviet history of the 1930s with the same meticulous attention to detail as his previous works: "Khrushchev Lied" (2011), "The Murder of Sergei Kirov" (2013), "Blood Lies" (2014), "Trotsky’s ‘Amalgams’" (2015), "Yezhov vs. Stalin" (2016), "Leon Trotsky’s Collaboration with Germany and Japan" (2017), and "The Mystery of the Katyn Massacre; The Evidence, The Solution" (2018).


Is it possible that every you have heard and read on the Soviet Union is complete nonsense.

After all, there is much money to be made writing plausible polemics for rich people.

Just look at all the physics professors, finding it impossible to live on their meagre pensions, writing
bollocks on climate change.

And, as Adolf Hitler correctly observed in Min Kampf, the bigger the lie, the more likely it is to be believed

comrade stalin
moscow
 
Last edited:
Werbung:
Everyone knows that Joseph Stalin was a monster who killed 65 million people !!!

Right ?

What if there is an alternative to the avalanche of propaganda that started with the Russian Revolution and
has continued ever since.

The Hoover institute is a think tank that has supplied numerous republican WarParty positions


One of Hoover's most useful assets is the historian Stephen Kotkin who has published two ,books of a projected three-part series
on joseph stalin


Stalin: Paradoxes of Power​


Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929-1941​



Each book is replete with many footnotes. I have read both.

What if some pesky contrarian check the footnotes on one of the books and discovered it was a pack of lies..

Step forward Grover Furr


In October 2017 Stephen Kotkin, professor of history at Princeton University, published "Stalin. Waiting for Hitler, 1929 – 1941." In it, Kotkin accuses Soviet leader Joseph Stalin of dozens of terrible crimes and atrocities.
The appearance of Kotkin’s scholarship is daunting: 909 pages of text, more than 5200 footnotes, and 47 pages of bibliography in tiny, triple-column type.

But Grover Furr has carefully and methodically studied every one of the hundreds of allegations of atrocity, crime, and misdeeds of any kind that Kotkin attributes to Stalin and his closest advisers.

Furr has checked every reference, every article and book, that Kotkin cites as evidence. The result: Furr has found that every single "crime" Kotkin alleges is false - a fabrication. Not a single accusation holds up.

On the evidence, Stalin committed NO crime, no atrocities – for if he had, Kotkin would surely have uncovered at least one. Furr’s exhaustive research shows that Soviet history of the 1930s, has been falsified.

Furr’s book is a model of meticulous examination of evidence and careful, objective analysis and deduction."Stalin. Waiting For … The Truth" exposes the lies and falsehoods behind Soviet history of the 1930s with the same meticulous attention to detail as his previous works: "Khrushchev Lied" (2011), "The Murder of Sergei Kirov" (2013), "Blood Lies" (2014), "Trotsky’s ‘Amalgams’" (2015), "Yezhov vs. Stalin" (2016), "Leon Trotsky’s Collaboration with Germany and Japan" (2017), and "The Mystery of the Katyn Massacre; The Evidence, The Solution" (2018).


Is it possible that every you have heard and read on the Soviet Union is complete nonsense.

After all, there is much money to be made writing plausible polemics for rich people.

Just look at all the physics professors, finding it impossible to live on their meagre pensions, writing
bollocks on climate change.

And, as Adolf Hitler correctly observed in Min Kampf, the bigger the lie, the more likely it is to be believed

comrade stalin
moscow
Mamdani is proving rich communist immigrants can get elected by fraud in NYC.
 
Nothing to do with the usa or mandani

you did not even read the acticle

post something new like the validity of Furr's methodology instead of the usual stale inaccurate pro-frump polemics

comrade stalin
moscow
 
Mamdani is proving rich communist immigrants can get elected by fraud in NYC.
There is NO EVIDENCE of New York City voter fraud in NYC.
Momdani got 50.4% of all votes cast.
Cuomi got 41.6
Silwa the Republican, mere 7.1%

Momdani is not any sort of Communist, he is a Democratic Socialist.
You are an ignorant fundie that lies constantly in this forum. You know zilch about politics, all you do is ape Shitshizpants.
 
There is NO EVIDENCE of New York City voter fraud in NYC.
Momdani got 50.4% of all votes cast.
Cuomi got 41.6
Silwa the Republican, mere 7.1%

Momdani is not any sort of Communist, he is a Democratic Socialist.
You are an ignorant fundie that lies constantly in this forum. You know zilch about politics, all you do is ape Shitshizpants.
You claim there is no evidence of voter fraud but as is so typical of democrats you miserably fail to prove you are right about that.
 
You claim there is no evidence of voter fraud but as is so typical of democrats you miserably fail to prove you are right about that.

almost the ultimate logical fallacy - having to disprove something that does not exist..

no comrade..YOU have to prove fraud exists..

once again a thread has been hijacked for a frumpian hobby horse

comrade stalin
moscw
 
almost the ultimate logical fallacy - having to disprove something that does not exist..

no comrade..YOU have to prove fraud exists..

once again a thread has been hijacked for a frumpian hobby horse

comrade stalin
moscw
Claiming Hillary had no emails that she erased after Congress subpoenaed them is stupid and ignorant, as is claiming the massive evidence of fraud is not evidence of fraud.
 
Nothing to do with the usa or mandani

you did not even read the acticle

post something new like the validity of Furr's methodology instead of the usual stale inaccurate pro-frump polemics

comrade stalin
moscow
Result of Seeing Too Many Impossible Sci-Fi Fantasies

It is beyond human ability to create such a widespread but fake condemnation of Stalin. All the money in the world wouldn't be enough to bribe all his accusers.
 
Werbung:
almost the ultimate logical fallacy - having to disprove something that does not exist..

no comrade..YOU have to prove fraud exists..

once again a thread has been hijacked for a frumpian hobby horse

comrade stalin
moscw
The Anti-Populist Constitution Is What Put the Crack in the Liberty Bell

The biggest fraud was not letting the voters decide, through a referendum, on who else could vote. What kind of club wouldn't let its members decide on letting in new members, instead of a few officers bringing in whomever they wanted? Under this exclusivist system, voting itself is a fraud; it takes away self-determination on the issues.
 
Back
Top