And it's all one big lie.

Your source does not explain why they think Clinton was able to declassify documents and Trump was not.
Clinton followed to law. Trump didn't.
FFS mark. Go and research it. You're completely wrong. Stop stamping your feet like a spoilt kid. Grow up.
 
Werbung:
Clinton followed to law. Trump didn't.
FFS mark. Go and research it. You're completely wrong. Stop stamping your feet like a spoilt kid. Grow up.
You do not show how Clinton allegedly followed the law and Trump allegedly did not. What processes do you think both presidents were supposed to follow?
 
You do not show how Clinton allegedly followed the law and Trump allegedly did not. What processes do you think both presidents were supposed to follow?
The archives act has strict procedures for declassifying documents.
Clinton followed and and was entitled to them.
There is no record of where Trump applied or was approved.

Stop making bullshit stories. You know I'm right dickhead. Grow up.
 
The archives act has strict procedures for declassifying documents.
Clinton followed and and was entitled to them.
There is no record of where Trump applied or was approved.

Stop making bullshit stories. You know I'm right dickhead. Grow up.
You offer no proof that Clinton followed the procedures and Trump did not. You don't even detail what those procedures are. Your partisan attack on Trump, therefore, has all the appearance of a leftist hit job, not an honest evaluation.
 
You offer no proof that Clinton followed the procedures and Trump did not. You don't even detail what those procedures are. Your partisan attack on Trump, therefore, has all the appearance of a leftist hit job, not an honest evaluation.
Here we go again. Clinton. Was permitted to take them home and now you want it proven. But Trump was charged with the same because he did not declassify them like Clinton.

Accept you're wrong you old dickhead.
Trump will be convicted if his crimes and Clinton wasn't. Does that tell you something?
Oh. It's those corrupt democrats again. Thought so.
 
Here we go again. Clinton. Was permitted to take them home and now you want it proven. But Trump was charged with the same because he did not declassify them like Clinton.

Accept you're wrong you old dickhead.
Trump will be convicted if his crimes and Clinton wasn't. Does that tell you something?
Oh. It's those corrupt democrats again. Thought so.
You offer no details to prove that Clinton's hoarding of classified material he opted to keep was any different than Trump's possession of classified material.
 
You offer no details to prove that Clinton's hoarding of classified material he opted to keep was any different than Trump's possession of classified material.
You offer no evidence Trump was allowed to steal top secret documents and show people in his private club.
 
Exactly. Nobody has proven any of that.

I was hoping you'd ask that silly question. Shut up dickhead. You're wrong.




 
I was hoping you'd ask that silly question. Shut up dickhead. You're wrong.




All the bent evidence but none of them irrefutably proven before wise Americans unaffected by damaging bias.
 
All the bent evidence but none of them irrefutably proven before wise Americans unaffected by damaging bias.
Bent evidence?
You just quoted some scandal sheet about how the voting machines were supposed to be corrupted without one shred of evidence yet every reputable news source publishes the fact and supported by witnesses and you call it bent.
You're fucked in the head.
 
Bent evidence?
You just quoted some scandal sheet about how the voting machines were supposed to be corrupted without one shred of evidence yet every reputable news source publishes the fact and supported by witnesses and you call it bent.
You're fucked in the head.
Every reasonable American whether Democrat or Republican should want the voting machines in question to be thoroughly examined, especially since both Democrats and Republicans have said the machines are vulnerable to illegal corruption, in order to prove the machines were not corrupted in the 2020 election. It may be too late to catch some corruption now, however, since there has been sufficient time to allow for suspected manipulators and programmers to wipe the evidence of illegal corruption from the suspect machines.
 
Every reasonable American whether Democrat or Republican should want the voting machines in question to be thoroughly examined, especially since both Democrats and Republicans have said the machines are vulnerable to illegal corruption, in order to prove the machines were not corrupted in the 2020 election. It may be too late to catch some corruption now, however, since there has been sufficient time to allow for suspected manipulators and programmers to wipe the evidence of illegal corruption from the suspect machines.
They were examined and found not faulty and it was financed by you GOP.
That must hurt when everything is proven against your beliefs. You must like pissing against the wind.
 
They were examined and found not faulty and it was financed by you GOP.
That must hurt when everything is proven against your beliefs. You must like pissing against the wind.
The examiners missed things other experts did not. Honest Americans want the conflicting testimony regarding voting machines to be thoroughly and factually resolved in order to restore confidence in our elections system.
 
Werbung:
The examiners missed things other experts did not. Honest Americans want the conflicting testimony regarding voting machines to be thoroughly and factually resolved in order to restore confidence in our elections system.
Here's a ditty that applies to the godbotherers like you.

 
Back
Top