Well, I don't feel the need to justify what was obviously sarcasm, and you are too ignorant to realize such. And if you think you have any opinions that are solely those of your own without the support of others then I would say you are quite the narcissist, or a simple egomaniac.
As to a "great leader", there would be many qualifications the first would be one of honesty, and honor. However, in the culture we now live in these types have mostly disappeared.
Well, I don't feel the need to justify what was obviously sarcasm, and you are too ignorant to realize such. And if you think you have any opinions that are solely those of your own without the support of others then I would say you are quite the narcissist, or a simple egomaniac.
Sarcasm is mockery and benefits no one.
I think you might have confused fact with opinion. Opinions formed by me are mine, how I formed them doesn't matter, that's why
they're called "my opinions". For example "Reagan was not a saint" is not an opinion, it's a fact, and requires no justification.
Reagan was a great leader, is an opinion and requires justification.
Attempting to demean via name calling is a sign of immaturity, and is an opinion held by many, but it is also "my opinion", and only
requires my justification.
Thank you Old_Trapper70 for a brief and concise opinion. I appreciate that, as do others, I'm sure.
It would have been, and would be, an invaluable gain to the countries of the world if all great leaders had been, and were, honest
and honerable men. To our misfortune not all leaders had, or has those two character traits.
In my opinion, to be a great leader requires the communication skills to unite the masses toward a common goal, be it good or evil,
as demonstrated by leaders such as F.D.R., Churchill, Hitler, and J.F.K to name a few.
Also in my opinion, all wars are bad, and all freedoms are good.
Thank again.
YEH YAH