Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Dancing around the truth of that statement is harming your two's credibility.You know full well we taxpayers already foot a universal-care expenditure that covers everyone: Eightfold expensive guaranteed ER visits. Then we also pay separately for Medicaid and the VA programs with different clerical systems that serve to do essentially the same thing.So either you're in favor of eliminating those segments of existing universal care and instead providing corporate welfare to private insurers via subsidies, or you're for combining them into one clerical system without CEO bonuses and advertising costs? Private insurance subsidies [welfare] will only take some off the rolls of that ER-situation, still leaving millions to lean on it anyway in addition, and also those subsidies would go to CEO bonuses and advertising. And no...don't say it...I'll say it for you.. "the private medical insurers are too big to fail". Did I get it right?You feel the less-expensive and more fiscally-responsible route would be to pay more and get less? Let me just say that I won't be hiring you to do my financial advising or brokering anytime in the near future...And our creditors over in China are probably wanting their lendees to be fiscally-responsible lest they decide to raise interest rates in response to our inability to say no to irresponsible private entities who throw their tantrum-money at suppression of saving taxpayer costs and instead have the gall to ask for more subsidies [welfare] for their already uberrich CEOs. If America was a client looking for a loan with their present portfolio, I'd laugh them right out of my bank.
Dancing around the truth of that statement is harming your two's credibility.
You know full well we taxpayers already foot a universal-care expenditure that covers everyone: Eightfold expensive guaranteed ER visits. Then we also pay separately for Medicaid and the VA programs with different clerical systems that serve to do essentially the same thing.
So either you're in favor of eliminating those segments of existing universal care and instead providing corporate welfare to private insurers via subsidies, or you're for combining them into one clerical system without CEO bonuses and advertising costs? Private insurance subsidies [welfare] will only take some off the rolls of that ER-situation, still leaving millions to lean on it anyway in addition, and also those subsidies would go to CEO bonuses and advertising. And no...don't say it...I'll say it for you.. "the private medical insurers are too big to fail". Did I get it right?
You feel the less-expensive and more fiscally-responsible route would be to pay more and get less? Let me just say that I won't be hiring you to do my financial advising or brokering anytime in the near future...
And our creditors over in China are probably wanting their lendees to be fiscally-responsible lest they decide to raise interest rates in response to our inability to say no to irresponsible private entities who throw their tantrum-money at suppression of saving taxpayer costs and instead have the gall to ask for more subsidies [welfare] for their already uberrich CEOs. If America was a client looking for a loan with their present portfolio, I'd laugh them right out of my bank.
