Reply to thread

That may well be the case in some isolated instances. But I'm not arguing individual actions. I'm saying "overall" there is a credible reason at times to allow a previously discriminated against group (in law we call that the damaged party) to receive an adjustment in terms.




I think you bring up a good point but let's explore that further. If the case is that there are "qualified" but not the "most qualified" minority job candidates because of the original discrimination then if you do nothing... then that never changes.


This will and is working itself out over time. Today minorities in huge numbers go to college and advanced training programs so there are as qualified minority as majority candidates in most instances. 


What I think we can both agree on is that at some point soon the playing field should be deemed as reasonably enough fair & balanced and no additional benefit should be needed by any group. 




That's reasonable. But that's just you.;)


I'm not sure that as a Conservative you'll be able to fully embrace an Obama administration's policies but I can tell you this. I fully believe the country will do better than it has in the previous 8 years. That's my goal for the future.


Back
Top