Censorship in Israel

[mark francis]

I remind you your source, fox, were proven to be wrong with the dominion thing. Perhaps those shown are more reliable.

A few people at Fox were found to have been wrong for the statements they made. I will not argue the facts since I do not know the details, but I am reminded of the many accounts of prisoners who have been exonerated after spending years in prison for crimes they were later found not guilty of committing. Courts can be capricious and can be wrong.

 

[mark francis]

If you are a reasonably intelligent adult, you find a responsible news source which has never been caught spreading lies.

You go back a few years and get an idea of how important honesty is to them journalistically and in terms of their conscience.

If they claim to be committed to honest reporting and you haven't caught them in any big serious intentional lies over many years, believe them and use them to find even better and truthier sources.

I have on file credible reports from past years that have since been taken down by leftist speech censor police, which is similar to communist propaganda control of speech insuring that only the communist story lines are published while all others are taken down.

 

[LittleGreenMan]

A few people at Fox were found to have been wrong for the statements they made. I will not argue the facts since I do not know the details, but I am reminded of the many accounts of prisoners who have been exonerated after spending years in prison for crimes they were later found not guilty of committing. Courts can be capricious and can be wrong.

This is not strictly speaking true. This is a defamation suit settlement. FOX couldn't present evidence because the machines were not available for checking until after the culprits had time to return them to proper settings. Information, no matter how true and damning that has been obtained surreptitiously without owner permission or court order is considered stolen and not admissible in court as evidence or even hearsay. Classic 4th Amendment defense. Add to that local courts not allowing examination of the machines in the tampered condition without some other proof or testimony of whistleblowers and you have bulletproof cheating anywhere Democrat judges exist in predominance. That's all the big cities. How can anything change? It gets worse. Notice that exit polls have disappeared? We don't want to cloud expectations... Now, they can just wait until they need 443,010 votes at 3AM , add 443,012 and presto! The machines can be accessed via wifi/sharing/cell phone now even though that's not supposed to be, and results can be monitored with real time pings, recombobulated, and only a recount of paper ballots & signatures means anything. If Dems can keep the ball in the air with Dem judges, Dem poll workers, Dem election commissioners, Dem Governors, all watched closely by Dem federal agencies, et al, in short objecting & muddying the waters, until they get declared the winners, other Dem judges rule the matter closed.

Dems are good at cheating, getting better and the GOP is spineless. Now add Catch 22: The machines are in possession of the state, but the property of the company. Judges have ruled that GOP couldn't examine the machines before the election because they had no injury/cause of action; case thrown out. After the election they had no evidence that what cheating may have occurred was enough to change the results, so, no injury/cause of action; case thrown out. The Dems are better at using our system against us than the GOP at using the system to catch them. Case closed.

 

[LittleGreenMan]

Murdoch, the elder is/was conservative, but Lackluster Murdoch, the lessor is running the show now and is every bit as conservative as Hillary Clinton, but she's better looking.

 

[Boris Norris]

A few people at Fox were found to have been wrong for the statements they made. I will not argue the facts since I do not know the details, but I am reminded of the many accounts of prisoners who have been exonerated after spending years in prison for crimes they were later found not guilty of committing. Courts can be capricious and can be wrong.

Don't change the subject
You are wrong so admit it.

 

[mark francis]

Don't change the subject
You are wrong so admit it.

I am wrong? What proof did Dominion or the case produce that Dominion machines were not corrupted to stuff ballots for Biden in 2020?

 

[Boris Norris]

I am wrong? What proof did Dominion or the case produce that Dominion machines were not corrupted to stuff ballots for Biden in 2020?

Dominion didn't. The GOP proved there was no faults etc.
End of story. Fox lost. Does that tell you anything idiot. Fyck off. You're as dumb as rocks.

 

[mark francis]

Dominion didn't. The GOP proved there was no faults etc.
End of story. Fox lost. Does that tell you anything idiot. Fyck off. You're as dumb as rocks.

Wrong. Nobody has proved anything except for the fact that Dominion machines are knows to be susceptible to fraud. Not examining the machines immediately after the election was a big mistake and indication of a Democrat coverup.

 

[Boris Norris]

Wrong. Nobody has proved anything except for the fact that Dominion machines are knows to be susceptible to fraud. Not examining the machines immediately after the election was a big mistake and indication of a Democrat coverup.

No. There was no fraud so continue to piss against the wind all you like.

 

[mark francis]

No. There was no fraud so continue to piss against the wind all you like.

The US government made a huge mistake in 2020 by rushing through certification of the questionable election without examining hundreds of hacking-susceptible voting machines that showed signs of corruption.


https://www.westernjournal.com/government-admits-dominion-voting-machines-vulnerable-hacking-16-states/ 6-9-22

Dominion voting machines fill the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, for early voting on Oct. 12, 2020. (Brynn Anderson / AP)

Government Admits Dominion Voting Machines Vulnerable to Hacking in 16 States

By Mike Landry June 9, 2022 at 8:23am

Dominion voting machines have the potential to be breached, according to an advisory from the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

These, of course, are the machines that caused controversy in the 2020 election.

The Dominion machines are now shown to have nine vulnerabilities, according to the Friday advisory.

So far nothing bad has happened. The advisory said, “While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.”

Indeed, CISA has called the 2020 election “the most secure in American history.”

Hacking the machines would require both physical access to devices and the election management system, or the ability to alter files before being uploaded to the machines, CISA said.

The descriptions of the nine vulnerabilities are fairly technical and include recommendations for election officials to mitigate them.

In the meantime, at least 16 states have these potentially vulnerable machines, according to The Associated Press.

While CISA brushed aside the ghosts of elections past, it’s concerned about Dominion’s weaknesses in the future.

​

“Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems,” the advisory said.

“Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities.”

And don’t forget that with the midterm elections coming, fixing the problems become critical.

The CISA advisory is based on a report by computer scientist J. Alex Halderman of the University of Michigan. He has previously argued for multiple safeguards to be put in place for voting machines and has said that hand-marked paper ballots are the most secure way to vote, according to the AP.

Hartman noted that while it’s difficult to carry out a hacking, it can happen.

“They are things that we should worry could be exploited by sophisticated attackers, such as hostile nation states, or by election insiders, and they would carry very serious consequences,” he told the AP.

Voters continually lament being unable to personally put their mark on a paper ballot.

Because — while it’s not perfect — there’s a sense of honesty when writing on a ballot, and there’s no machine in between.

 

[Boris Norris]

The US government made a huge mistake in 2020 by rushing through certification of the questionable election without examining hundreds of hacking-susceptible voting machines that showed signs of corruption.


https://www.westernjournal.com/government-admits-dominion-voting-machines-vulnerable-hacking-16-states/ 6-9-22

Dominion voting machines fill the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, for early voting on Oct. 12, 2020. (Brynn Anderson / AP)

Government Admits Dominion Voting Machines Vulnerable to Hacking in 16 States

By Mike Landry June 9, 2022 at 8:23am

Dominion voting machines have the potential to be breached, according to an advisory from the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

These, of course, are the machines that caused controversy in the 2020 election.

The Dominion machines are now shown to have nine vulnerabilities, according to the Friday advisory.

So far nothing bad has happened. The advisory said, “While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.”

Indeed, CISA has called the 2020 election “the most secure in American history.”

Hacking the machines would require both physical access to devices and the election management system, or the ability to alter files before being uploaded to the machines, CISA said.

The descriptions of the nine vulnerabilities are fairly technical and include recommendations for election officials to mitigate them.

In the meantime, at least 16 states have these potentially vulnerable machines, according to The Associated Press.

While CISA brushed aside the ghosts of elections past, it’s concerned about Dominion’s weaknesses in the future.

​

“Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems,” the advisory said.

“Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities.”

And don’t forget that with the midterm elections coming, fixing the problems become critical.

The CISA advisory is based on a report by computer scientist J. Alex Halderman of the University of Michigan. He has previously argued for multiple safeguards to be put in place for voting machines and has said that hand-marked paper ballots are the most secure way to vote, according to the AP.

Hartman noted that while it’s difficult to carry out a hacking, it can happen.

“They are things that we should worry could be exploited by sophisticated attackers, such as hostile nation states, or by election insiders, and they would carry very serious consequences,” he told the AP.

Voters continually lament being unable to personally put their mark on a paper ballot.

Because — while it’s not perfect — there’s a sense of honesty when writing on a ballot, and there’s no machine in between.

No mistake. Biden was elected. Get over it.

 

[LittleGreenMan]

The US government made a huge mistake in 2020 by rushing through certification of the questionable election without examining hundreds of hacking-susceptible voting machines that showed signs of corruption.


https://www.westernjournal.com/government-admits-dominion-voting-machines-vulnerable-hacking-16-states/ 6-9-22

Dominion voting machines fill the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, for early voting on Oct. 12, 2020. (Brynn Anderson / AP)

Government Admits Dominion Voting Machines Vulnerable to Hacking in 16 States

By Mike Landry June 9, 2022 at 8:23am

Dominion voting machines have the potential to be breached, according to an advisory from the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

These, of course, are the machines that caused controversy in the 2020 election.

The Dominion machines are now shown to have nine vulnerabilities, according to the Friday advisory.

So far nothing bad has happened. The advisory said, “While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.”

Indeed, CISA has called the 2020 election “the most secure in American history.”

Hacking the machines would require both physical access to devices and the election management system, or the ability to alter files before being uploaded to the machines, CISA said.

The descriptions of the nine vulnerabilities are fairly technical and include recommendations for election officials to mitigate them.

In the meantime, at least 16 states have these potentially vulnerable machines, according to The Associated Press.

While CISA brushed aside the ghosts of elections past, it’s concerned about Dominion’s weaknesses in the future.

​

“Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems,” the advisory said.

“Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities.”

And don’t forget that with the midterm elections coming, fixing the problems become critical.

The CISA advisory is based on a report by computer scientist J. Alex Halderman of the University of Michigan. He has previously argued for multiple safeguards to be put in place for voting machines and has said that hand-marked paper ballots are the most secure way to vote, according to the AP.

Hartman noted that while it’s difficult to carry out a hacking, it can happen.

“They are things that we should worry could be exploited by sophisticated attackers, such as hostile nation states, or by election insiders, and they would carry very serious consequences,” he told the AP.

Voters continually lament being unable to personally put their mark on a paper ballot.

Because — while it’s not perfect — there’s a sense of honesty when writing on a ballot, and there’s no machine in between.

Well, what do you have outside this?

 

[mark francis]

No mistake. Biden was elected. Get over it.

Democrats want the fraud to be ignored and the stolen election accepted and are willing to jail hundreds of innocent Americans to try to force their point.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats want the fraud to be ignored and the stolen election accepted and are willing to jail hundreds of innocent Americans to try to force their point.

Yes and we're very good at it. And we'll do it again if Trump is a threat.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats want the fraud to be ignored and the stolen election accepted and are willing to jail hundreds of innocent Americans to try to force their point.

Here's a briefing on how the impeachment is going.
Not looking good for an impeachment .

Inside the House GOP’s key Biden impeachment claims

As House Republicans forge ahead with a vote to formalize an impeachment inquiry against President Biden, they are using some new details and testimony to prop up hotly disputed allegations that he…

thehill.com