Cop....IMMEDIATELY CHARGED WITH MURDER!!!!....Long-Overdue.

[Randomguy]

How is your theory more acceptable to all than a racist theory that blacks are racist looters because of their greed and envy of whites more wealthy than themselves?

Perhaps it is not. What’s your point?

 

[Randomguy]

Don't forget George Zimmerman, the hispanic misidentified as a white guy who was declared innocent by a jury of his peers, prompting racist blacks to murder half a dozen whites in retaliation.

Sometimes you like juries, sometimes you don’t. You do not have enough self respect to try to avoid obvious inconsistencies like this.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Both Zimmerman and Trevon Martin were fools, fighting one another for no reason whatever.
Martin was shot to death by Zimmerman. At one point Zimmerman had a million dollars and a passport and no warrants against him. He could easily have hopped on a plane and lived the rest of his life very well in Peru. So he was also quite stupid.

 

[mark francis]

It's no theory. It's a fact. They are much wanted by prisons and the military.

If most or all police are racists because they arrest blacks then are not most or all blacks crooks and thugs for hating law enforcement officers for no justifiable reason?

 

[mark francis]

Just because you believe the election was stolen doesn't mean it was.
Go away you old fool

Claiming there was no significant voting fraud does not prove vulnerable voting machines were not corrupted, does not prove ballots lacking valid addresses or signatures were legitimate, does not prove the numbers of ballots cast in the name of the dead were insignificant, does not prove that only insignioficant numbers of illegal immigrants voted, does not prove that double voting did not have a major impact on the election, does not prove election workers did not commit the crimes that observers claimed in affidavits to have seem them committing, and so forth.

 

[mark francis]

Sometimes you like juries, sometimes you don’t. You do not have enough self respect to try to avoid obvious inconsistencies like this.

I don't approve of wicked savages murdering innocent people because they do not like a jury verdict, like what happened as a result of the jury finding George Zimmerman innocent. I also did not approve of wicked savages trashing LA because they did not like the first verdict in the trial of the Rodney King arresting officers. I condemn the double jeorpardy retirial of the officers so the bent court could find the innocent officers guilty to satisfy the unholy desires of the mob for such a perversion of justice.

 

[mark francis]

Both Zimmerman and Trevon Martin were fools, fighting one another for no reason whatever.
Martin was shot to death by Zimmerman. At one point Zimmerman had a million dollars and a passport and no warrants against him. He could easily have hopped on a plane and lived the rest of his life very well in Peru. So he was also quite stupid.

So, Martin was a fool for brutally attacking a smaller community watch volunteer he did not like because the volunteer was doing what he was supposed to do? And you think Zimmrman was stupid for not wastefully spending money on pleasures away from the neighborhood he was assigned to watch?

 

[Randomguy]

If most or all police are racists because they arrest blacks then are not most or all blacks crooks and thugs for hating law enforcement officers for no justifiable reason?

Maybe you are right but did anyone say “most?” If not you are the garbage of online debating, the worst possible kind.

 

[Randomguy]

Claiming there was no significant voting fraud does not prove vulnerable voting machines were not corrupted, does not prove ballots lacking valid addresses or signatures were legitimate, does not prove the numbers of ballots cast in the name of the dead were insignificant, does not prove that only insignioficant numbers of illegal immigrants voted, does not prove that double voting did not have a major impact on the election, does not prove election workers did not commit the crimes that observers claimed in affidavits to have seem them committing, and so forth.

The burden of proof is on you and you have failed it miserably.

 

[Randomguy]

I don't approve of …

Sometimes you like juries, sometimes you don’t. You do not have enough self respect to try to avoid obvious inconsistencies like this.

 

[Boris Norris]

Claiming there was no significant voting fraud does not prove vulnerable voting machines were not corrupted, does not prove ballots lacking valid addresses or signatures were legitimate, does not prove the numbers of ballots cast in the name of the dead were insignificant, does not prove that only insignioficant numbers of illegal immigrants voted, does not prove that double voting did not have a major impact on the election, does not prove election workers did not commit the crimes that observers claimed in affidavits to have seem them committing, and so forth.

Not interested. You lose again. You're failures are forming a pattern.

 

[Boris Norris]

If most or all police are racists because they arrest blacks then are not most or all blacks crooks and thugs for hating law enforcement officers for no justifiable reason?

Probably but that's not the topic. Try again.

 

[mark francis]

The burden of proof is on you and you have failed it miserably.

No, democrats must first prove those who objected to the 2020 election results were committing sedition before jailing them for sedition. If democrats cannot prove the election was not seriously tainted by fraud then they are guilty of falsely accusing and falsely imprisoning their opponents for allegedly committing a crime the democrats have never proven was a crime.

 

[mark francis]

Sometimes you like juries, sometimes you don’t. You do not have enough self respect to try to avoid obvious inconsistencies like this.

Judging juries is not a matter of numerical equality. Juries that are tainted are tainted whether they represent 9% of all juries or 90% of all juries.

 

[pjmret]

No, democrats must first prove those who objected to the 2020 election results were committing sedition before jailing them for sedition. If democrats cannot prove the election was not seriously tainted by fraud then they are guilty of falsely accusing and falsely imprisoning their opponents for allegedly committing a crime the democrats have never proven was a crime.

Name people jailed who weren't charged with a crime duh