Corrupt court shreds the US constitution

[Stalin]

The Supreme Court’s decision added to the Trump administration’s collection of dubious legal victories on Friday when it handed down a ruling limiting the nationwide injunctions used by judges to halt President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to unwind over a century of settled law on birthright citizenship.

The 6-3 decision in Casa v. Trump would allow Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship to go into effect, despite the fact the order has repeatedly been found to be unconstitutional on its face. The door has been flung open to chaos, and not just for immigrants or children born on U.S. soil to undocumented immigrants.

The Supreme Court’s decision also set the stage for potentially terrifying new precedents, according to New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin (D). And it moves Trump one step closer to the kind of autocratic rule that has clearly become his goal in his second term.

“If we allow him to dismantle the 14th Amendment with an executive order, he can do it with any other amendment,” Platkin said during a press conference Friday.

In her dissent, Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson didn’t mince words. With the majority’s decision, any president could enact a lawless order and courts would be potentially hamstrung, or even helpless, to stop it.

“I have no doubt that, if judges must allow the Executive to act unlawfully in some circumstances, as the Court concludes today, executive lawlessness will flourish, and from there, it is not difficult to predict how this all ends,” Jackson wrote Friday.

Platkin is one of the 22 state attorneys general who fought Trump’s order by suing in federal court, which resulted in four nationwide injunctions. One Washington state judge who issued an injunction, U.S. District Judge John Coughenour, told attorneys for the plaintiffs and the Justice Department this spring that in the four decades he had sat on the bench he had never seen such a cut-and-dry question.

“I can’t remember another case where the question presented was clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” Coughenour said. (Cougenhour was appointed by one of Trump’s idols, former President Ronald Reagan.)

Trump's Victory In Birthright Citizenship Puts Him 1 Step Closer To Being A King

Even as it will likely result in chaos for anyone lower than the proverbial throne.

nz.news.yahoo.com

comrade stalin
moscow

 

[mark francis]

The Supreme Court’s decision added to the Trump administration’s collection of dubious legal victories on Friday when it handed down a ruling limiting the nationwide injunctions used by judges to halt President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to unwind over a century of settled law on birthright citizenship.

The 6-3 decision in Casa v. Trump would allow Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship to go into effect, despite the fact the order has repeatedly been found to be unconstitutional on its face. The door has been flung open to chaos, and not just for immigrants or children born on U.S. soil to undocumented immigrants.

The Supreme Court’s decision also set the stage for potentially terrifying new precedents, according to New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin (D). And it moves Trump one step closer to the kind of autocratic rule that has clearly become his goal in his second term.

“If we allow him to dismantle the 14th Amendment with an executive order, he can do it with any other amendment,” Platkin said during a press conference Friday.

In her dissent, Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson didn’t mince words. With the majority’s decision, any president could enact a lawless order and courts would be potentially hamstrung, or even helpless, to stop it.

“I have no doubt that, if judges must allow the Executive to act unlawfully in some circumstances, as the Court concludes today, executive lawlessness will flourish, and from there, it is not difficult to predict how this all ends,” Jackson wrote Friday.

Platkin is one of the 22 state attorneys general who fought Trump’s order by suing in federal court, which resulted in four nationwide injunctions. One Washington state judge who issued an injunction, U.S. District Judge John Coughenour, told attorneys for the plaintiffs and the Justice Department this spring that in the four decades he had sat on the bench he had never seen such a cut-and-dry question.

“I can’t remember another case where the question presented was clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” Coughenour said. (Cougenhour was appointed by one of Trump’s idols, former President Ronald Reagan.)

Trump's Victory In Birthright Citizenship Puts Him 1 Step Closer To Being A King

Even as it will likely result in chaos for anyone lower than the proverbial throne.

nz.news.yahoo.com

comrade stalin
moscow

Constitutional court judgments are getting out of hand. America needs serious judicial reforms. Judges should not be issuing unconstitutional edicts, mandates, or imperialistic orders like tyrannical kings under no authority but themselves.

 

[Boris Norris]

Constitutional court judgments are getting out of hand.

No. They are giving judgements.

America needs serious judicial reforms.

You mean like get rid of all democrat judges.

Judges should not be issuing unconstitutional edicts, mandates, or imperialistic orders like tyrannical kings under no authority but themselves.

I remind you that trumps executive orders are out of control and now there is no scrutiny.
Power without authority is tyranny.
But you like fascist. All godbotherers and republican are attracted to bullies. It gives them a sense of power.
This king will soon be without clothes.

 

[mark francis]

The Supreme Court’s decision added to the Trump administration’s collection of dubious legal victories on Friday when it handed down a ruling limiting the nationwide injunctions used by judges to halt President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to unwind over a century of settled law on birthright citizenship.

The 6-3 decision in Casa v. Trump would allow Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship to go into effect, despite the fact the order has repeatedly been found to be unconstitutional on its face. The door has been flung open to chaos, and not just for immigrants or children born on U.S. soil to undocumented immigrants.

The Supreme Court’s decision also set the stage for potentially terrifying new precedents, according to New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin (D). And it moves Trump one step closer to the kind of autocratic rule that has clearly become his goal in his second term.

“If we allow him to dismantle the 14th Amendment with an executive order, he can do it with any other amendment,” Platkin said during a press conference Friday.

In her dissent, Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson didn’t mince words. With the majority’s decision, any president could enact a lawless order and courts would be potentially hamstrung, or even helpless, to stop it.

“I have no doubt that, if judges must allow the Executive to act unlawfully in some circumstances, as the Court concludes today, executive lawlessness will flourish, and from there, it is not difficult to predict how this all ends,” Jackson wrote Friday.

Platkin is one of the 22 state attorneys general who fought Trump’s order by suing in federal court, which resulted in four nationwide injunctions. One Washington state judge who issued an injunction, U.S. District Judge John Coughenour, told attorneys for the plaintiffs and the Justice Department this spring that in the four decades he had sat on the bench he had never seen such a cut-and-dry question.

“I can’t remember another case where the question presented was clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” Coughenour said. (Cougenhour was appointed by one of Trump’s idols, former President Ronald Reagan.)

Trump's Victory In Birthright Citizenship Puts Him 1 Step Closer To Being A King

Even as it will likely result in chaos for anyone lower than the proverbial throne.

nz.news.yahoo.com

comrade stalin
moscow

Constitutional court judgments are getting out of hand. America needs serious judicial reforms. Judges should not be issuing unconstitutional edicts, mandates,or imperialistic orders like tyrannical kings under no authority but themselves.

No. They are giving judgements.


You mean like get rid of all democrat judges.

I remind you that trumps executive orders are out of control and now there is no scrutiny.
Power without authority is tyranny.
But you like fascist. All godbotherers and republican are attracted to bullies. It gives them a sense of power.
This king will soon be without clothes.

Democrats and their leftist lawyers and judges claim Trump is out of control. American conservatives and the SCOTUS say radical leftist Democrats and their lawyers and judges have been out-of-control with their judge-shopping for nationwide injunctions designed to overthrow Trump and conservatism in America.

 

[Boris Norris]

Constitutional court judgments are getting out of hand. America needs serious judicial reforms. Judges should not be issuing unconstitutional edicts, mandates,or imperialistic orders like tyrannical kings under no authority but themselves.

Democrats and their leftist lawyers and judges claim Trump is out of control. American conservatives and the SCOTUS say radical leftist Democrats and their lawyers and judges have been out-of-control with their judge-shopping for nationwide injunctions designed to overthrow Trump and conservatism in America.

It doesn't matter what you think.
its a fact. You'll eventually learn the damage you've done.

 

[Stalin]

the marxist perspective..as usual right on the money

"...The US Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA marks a new milestone in the collapse of American democracy. In a 6-3 ruling issued Thursday, the far-right majority sided with the Trump administration and stripped federal courts of the power to issue universal injunctions—even in cases where government policies are clearly unconstitutional.

The immediate effect of the decision is to permit the government to prepare to implement Trump’s executive order targeting birthright citizenship—one of the most fundamental democratic principles in American law. This principle is enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment, adopted in the aftermath of the Civil War to guarantee citizenship to all those born in the United States, regardless of race, ancestry or parentage.

But the implications of the ruling go far beyond this specific case. It guts the power of the judiciary to stop unconstitutional actions by the executive. It means that even when a federal court rules that a presidential order violates fundamental rights, the judge would have no power to prohibit the order from being enforced in the future.

The illegality of Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order, issued on his first day in office, is clear. As Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted in her dissent, the order “is patently unconstitutional.” She notes that by effectively abrogating birthright citizenship, the majority’s decision revives the Supreme Court’s notorious Dred Scott decision, which held that anyone of African ancestry could not be a citizen. After the Civil War, this ruling was overturned by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Several federal district courts have ruled the executive order unconstitutional, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court. The Trump administration, however, did not argue for the legality of its order. Instead, it argued that nationwide injunctions must be ended—that is, even though its actions are flagrantly illegal, judges should be stripped of the power to order the Trump administration to stop.

Sotomayor laid out the sweeping implications in her dissent, noting that the court has ruled that “no matter how illegal a law or policy, courts can never simply tell the Executive to stop enforcing it against anyone. Instead, the Government says, it should be able to apply the Citizenship Order (whose legality it does not defend) to everyone except the plaintiffs who filed this lawsuit.”

In other words, the Trump administration asserts the right to violate the Constitution at will, tying up any legal challenges in district-by-district, plaintiff-by-plaintiff cases, with confidence that the fascists on the Supreme Court will back it, as it did on Friday.

US Supreme Court backs dictatorship in ruling on birthright citizenship injunction

In its decision in Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court has dismantled constitutional protections, sanctioned executive lawlessness, and established the pseudo-legal foundation for presidential dictatorship.

www.wsws.org

comrade stalin
moscow

 

[mark francis]

It doesn't matter what you think.
its a fact. You'll eventually learn the damage you've done.

SCOTUS just dealt a blow to KBJ and leftist judges acting like kings ordering Trump and America around like common slaves.

 

[mark francis]

the marxist perspective..as usual right on the money

"...The US Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA marks a new milestone in the collapse of American democracy. In a 6-3 ruling issued Thursday, the far-right majority sided with the Trump administration and stripped federal courts of the power to issue universal injunctions—even in cases where government policies are clearly unconstitutional.

The immediate effect of the decision is to permit the government to prepare to implement Trump’s executive order targeting birthright citizenship—one of the most fundamental democratic principles in American law. This principle is enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment, adopted in the aftermath of the Civil War to guarantee citizenship to all those born in the United States, regardless of race, ancestry or parentage.

But the implications of the ruling go far beyond this specific case. It guts the power of the judiciary to stop unconstitutional actions by the executive. It means that even when a federal court rules that a presidential order violates fundamental rights, the judge would have no power to prohibit the order from being enforced in the future.

The illegality of Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order, issued on his first day in office, is clear. As Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted in her dissent, the order “is patently unconstitutional.” She notes that by effectively abrogating birthright citizenship, the majority’s decision revives the Supreme Court’s notorious Dred Scott decision, which held that anyone of African ancestry could not be a citizen. After the Civil War, this ruling was overturned by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Several federal district courts have ruled the executive order unconstitutional, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court. The Trump administration, however, did not argue for the legality of its order. Instead, it argued that nationwide injunctions must be ended—that is, even though its actions are flagrantly illegal, judges should be stripped of the power to order the Trump administration to stop.

Sotomayor laid out the sweeping implications in her dissent, noting that the court has ruled that “no matter how illegal a law or policy, courts can never simply tell the Executive to stop enforcing it against anyone. Instead, the Government says, it should be able to apply the Citizenship Order (whose legality it does not defend) to everyone except the plaintiffs who filed this lawsuit.”

In other words, the Trump administration asserts the right to violate the Constitution at will, tying up any legal challenges in district-by-district, plaintiff-by-plaintiff cases, with confidence that the fascists on the Supreme Court will back it, as it did on Friday.

US Supreme Court backs dictatorship in ruling on birthright citizenship injunction

In its decision in Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court has dismantled constitutional protections, sanctioned executive lawlessness, and established the pseudo-legal foundation for presidential dictatorship.

www.wsws.org

comrade stalin
moscow

Democrats know some latest SCOTUS rulings are devastating to the democrat party agenda, as well they should be.

 

[Phoenix68]

.
Everyone say....
"THANKS, MITCH....YOU LYIN' ASSHOLE!!!!"
.

.​

 

[Phoenix68]

.
October 31, 2023

Republicans have always used politics as revenge for "wrongs" committed against themselves.
.
.
June 27, 2025

.
.
May 2, 2012

.​

 

[mark francis]

.
October 31, 2023

Republicans have always used politics as revenge for "wrongs" committed against themselves.
.
.
June 27, 2025

.
.
May 2, 2012

.​

Democrats accuse many different Republicans of lying but adamantly deny that Democrats lie, commit insurrectionist violence, practice racism, hate Jews and Christians, or commit massive voting fraud.

 

[Boris Norris]

SCOTUS just dealt a blow to KBJ and leftist judges acting like kings ordering Trump and America around like common slaves.

Good.
Trump has the house and the senate, total immunity from any crimes and the SC now doing his bidding. Yet he's not a dictator. What could possibly go wrong.
Buckle up dickhead. You suckers are in for a rough ride.

 

[mark francis]

Good.
Trump has the house and the senate, total immunity from any crimes and the SC now doing his bidding. Yet he's not a dictator. What could possibly go wrong.
Buckle up dickhead. You suckers are in for a rough ride.

Democrats claim Trump could get away with all sorts of crimes and therefore must be evil. Trump has not and will not commit all sorts of crimes so condemning Trump for things they only falsely believe he might do is evil.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats claim Trump could get away with all sorts of crimes and therefore must be evil. Trump has not and will not commit all sorts of crimes so condemning Trump for things they only falsely believe he might do is evil.

It proves how much you know about the system. Idiot.

 

[mark francis]

It proves how much you know about the system. Idiot.

Everybody knows the Watergate corruption was wrong. Why everybody does not agree that illegal spying and lying on Trump for political purposes was also wrong remains a mystery.