cowardly trump didn't testify

[pjmret]

If he is such a liar as you claim without proof you should be glad the judge told him not to speak.

The judge didn't tell him not to speak
He wasn't allowed to interfere with the trial, legal *****

 

[Boris Norris]

If he is such a liar as you claim without proof you should be glad the judge told him not to speak.

Firstly, the 30000 proven lies prove he's a liar.

Secondly, the judge DID NOT tell him to not testify. It was his lawyers.
So cut your fucking bullshit you old soak.youre a liar.

 

[mark francis]

What testimony?

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/05/20/trump-hush-money-criminal-trial/judge-limits-trumps-expert-00158857​

1 WEEK AGO | INSIDE THE COURTHOUSE

Judge limits scope of testimony from Trump's planned expert witness​

Trump's team wanted the expert to testify about details of campaign finance law.

JOSH GERSTEIN
05/20/2024, 9:48AM ET

Justice Juan Merchan has sharply limited what Trump's planned expert witness can testify about.
Trump's defense team wants to call election law expert Brad Smith to testify about federal campaign finance law. But the judge ruled this morning that allowing Smith to testify expansively on that topic would supplant the judge's role to determine what the law is.

“There is no question this would result in a battle of the experts, which will only serve to confuse, and not assist, the jury,” Merchan declared near the beginning of today's court session.

Merchan refused to allow the noted expert to testify because he knew the expert's testimony would wreck his case.

 

[pjmret]

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/05/20/trump-hush-money-criminal-trial/judge-limits-trumps-expert-00158857​

1 WEEK AGO | INSIDE THE COURTHOUSE

Judge limits scope of testimony from Trump's planned expert witness​

Trump's team wanted the expert to testify about details of campaign finance law.

JOSH GERSTEIN
05/20/2024, 9:48AM ET

Justice Juan Merchan has sharply limited what Trump's planned expert witness can testify about.
Trump's defense team wants to call election law expert Brad Smith to testify about federal campaign finance law. But the judge ruled this morning that allowing Smith to testify expansively on that topic would supplant the judge's role to determine what the law is.

“There is no question this would result in a battle of the experts, which will only serve to confuse, and not assist, the jury,” Merchan declared near the beginning of today's court session.

So how is that legally wrong, legal *****?

 

[mark francis]

So how is that legally wrong, legal *****?

I guess you could say that in a biased courtroom with biased prosecutors and a taine=ted jury the judge can interpret laws any way he likes, even if his interpretation runs contrary to every recognized sensible expert opinion in the nation.

 

[pjmret]

I guess you could say that in a biased courtroom with biased prosecutors and a taine=ted jury the judge can interpret laws any way he likes, even if his interpretation runs contrary to every recognized sensible expert opinion in the nation.

Post credible experts saying the judge was wrong, legal *****

 

[Boris Norris]

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/05/20/trump-hush-money-criminal-trial/judge-limits-trumps-expert-00158857​

1 WEEK AGO | INSIDE THE COURTHOUSE

Judge limits scope of testimony from Trump's planned expert witness​

Trump's team wanted the expert to testify about details of campaign finance law.

JOSH GERSTEIN
05/20/2024, 9:48AM ET

Justice Juan Merchan has sharply limited what Trump's planned expert witness can testify about.
Trump's defense team wants to call election law expert Brad Smith to testify about federal campaign finance law. But the judge ruled this morning that allowing Smith to testify expansively on that topic would supplant the judge's role to determine what the law is.

“There is no question this would result in a battle of the experts, which will only serve to confuse, and not assist, the jury,” Merchan declared near the beginning of today's court session.

Merchan refused to allow the noted expert to testify because he knew the expert's testimony would wreck his case.

He clearly explained why and I'm sorry if you don't understand it.
Who said the expert would have aided Trump? We already know what he did was illegal.
Quote clearly it was a diversion and smokescreen to confuse the jury. It didn't work. Donny dickhead will be found guilty.

 

[the annoying thing]

Stay in topic. It doesn't matter what he would have said. His lawyers instructed him to not testify. I know you think otherwise but thinking is not your best developed trait. As usual blame the democrats. Idiot.

Why did

Trump said he would definitely testify, he said he wanted to. But he did not testify.
Just as he sad that he wanted to display his tax forms. He has never displayed them.
Just as he promised to make everything about Melania's residency and citizenship public. He did nothing.
He said he would build a wall. But he only built some pieces of a fence.
He said that Covid would just "go away,fffft!"like that! It did not, it killed thousands.
He sad he would pay off the national debt. Never came close
He said he had a better healthcare plan than Obamacare. He never had anything, as we knew when he said that "no one knew that healthcare was so difficult". But everyone knew this. Everyone has always known this.
Nothing Trump promises is fulfilled.

Trump is a rapey, diaper wearing lying con man fraud.

Really he wears diapers prove it and Joe's a better con man then trump and a bigger coward for hiding his interview tapes is ng executive privilege.hes hiding something yet morons like you are in denial

 

[mark francis]

He clearly explained why and I'm sorry if you don't understand it.
Who said the expert would have aided Trump? We already know what he did was illegal.
Quote clearly it was a diversion and smokescreen to confuse the jury. It didn't work. Donny dickhead will be found guilty.

Yes, the judge has his crooked wrong reasons for refusing to allow a well-respected and widely recognized law expert to testify and blow to pieces his whole misinterpretation and misapplication of the law.

 

[Boris Norris]

Yes, the judge has his crooked wrong reasons for refusing to allow a well-respected and widely recognized law

And he gave his reason that you don't understand which were quite valid and legal.

expert to testify and blow to pieces his whole misinterpretation and misapplication of the law.

Blow to pieces my arse. You couldn't possibly know what he knew or if his evidence would be damaging to anyone.
If the charges were wrong or the law misinterpreted, it would never got to the trial status.

Honestly, why have you descended into this hate. There was a time not long ago where you weren't so recalcitrant. Now if a republican farts you blame it on the democrats. You've become.e paranoid with hate now the truth of Trump is being exposed but you were warned.

If Trump is innocent he will be acquitted but he must be allowed to have a fair trial without an expert muddying the waters and poisoning the jury. That's what he was designed to do and the judge was too smart for him.

 

[mark francis]

And he gave his reason that you don't understand which were quite valid and legal.

In keeping with the lefty he is he has his 'reasons' for shutting down witnesses who expose the dishonesty and illegality of the leftist position.

 

[the annoying thing]

e
View attachment 13918

You mean like the cowards who defend Biden for using executive privilege to hear the tape where he was judged incompetent to face charges. Talk about cowardly .

 

[MusicLover]

Trump said he would definitely testify, he said he wanted to. But he did not testify.
Just as he sad that he wanted to display his tax forms. He has never displayed them.
Just as he promised to make everything about Melania's residency and citizenship public. He did nothing.
He said he would build a wall. But he only built some pieces of a fence.
He said that Covid would just "go away,fffft!"like that! It did not, it killed thousands.
He sad he would pay off the national debt. Never came close
He said he had a better healthcare plan than Obamacare. He never had anything, as we knew when he said that "no one knew that healthcare was so difficult". But everyone knew this. Everyone has always known this.
Nothing Trump promises is fulfilled.

Trump is a rapey, diaper wearing lying con man fraud.

I will add:

 

[MusicLover]

He said for weeks before he would testify but we know he's a liar. He was instructed not to by the minders.

Then he turned around and told another lie. That the gag order doesn't allow him to testify.

Merchan fact-checks Trump’s claim that he’s ‘not allowed to testify’ while under a gag order

Judge Juan Merchan told Donald Trump on Friday morning that he is, in fact, allowed to testify in court while under a gag order, addressing a false claim that Trump made the day before.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

I guess you could say that in a biased courtroom with biased prosecutors and a taine=ted jury the judge can interpret laws any way he likes, even if his interpretation runs contrary to every recognized sensible expert opinion in the nation.

The law is entirely clear. The jury in not tainted, the prosecutors are not biased. Trump says these dumb things because MAGA morons believe them.