CRAZY / CLUELESS CHICKENHAWKS READY TO JUMP INTO IRAN!!!!

Werbung:
No it do
Again, your age probably clouds your memory of the instance.
History proves your wrong.
No, it doesn't. Obama stole the money belonging by SCOTUS order to the victims of Iranian crime. Nobody can prove Obama distributed the hundreds of millions of dollars to the victims of Iranian terror that SCOTUS ordered him to release.
 
No it do

No, it doesn't. Obama stole the money belonging by SCOTUS order to the victims of Iranian crime. Nobody can prove Obama distributed the hundreds of millions of dollars to the victims of Iranian terror that SCOTUS ordered him to release.

Wrong again for about the millionth time. It was money that was frozen by bush.
It was not ordered. It was advised.
Why was it Obama's job to prove anything.
Get over it sucker.
 
Wrong again for about the millionth time. It was money that was frozen by bush.
It was not ordered. It was advised.
Why was it Obama's job to prove anything.
Get over it sucker.
That is not what the SCOTUS said and did Obama ever release the hundreds of millions of dollars of former Iranian funds SCOTUS ruled belonged to Iran's victims?
 
That is not what the SCOTUS said and did Obama ever release the hundreds of millions of dollars of former Iranian funds SCOTUS ruled belonged to Iran's victims?
I don't care what you believe because you believe there's a god and we know how ridiculous that is.

If course he released them in pallets of cash. It's well documented so cut your bullshyt conspiracy crap.
 
I don't care what you believe because you believe there's a god and we know how ridiculous that is.

If course he released them in pallets of cash. It's well documented so cut your bullshyt conspiracy crap.
When did Obama give Iranian cash held in US banks to American victims of Iranian terrorism?
 
When did Obama give Iranian cash held in US banks to American victims of Iranian terrorism?
I don't know.youre telling the story. I do know that cash was returned to them as per the nuclear reduction deal.

Trump arrives and wiped out everything that Obama did because he's a racist pig like you. Now he injects USA into another war unnecessarily because he hated Obama's successful deal.
So much for the big fat peacemaker and your defending the idiot. You're a waste of oxygen.
 
I don't know.youre telling the story. I do know that cash was returned to them as per the nuclear reduction deal.

Trump arrives and wiped out everything that Obama did because he's a racist pig like you. Now he injects USA into another war unnecessarily because he hated Obama's successful deal.
So much for the big fat peacemaker and your defending the idiot. You're a waste of oxygen.
You claim you know Obama released the Iranian cash to American victims of Iranian terror yet you have no knowledge of the facts or details. Your support of your opinion is very weak.
 
You claim you know Obama released the Iranian cash to American victims of Iranian terror yet you have no knowledge of the facts or details. Your support of your opinion is very weak.
Justices Roberts and Sotomayer ruled in 2016 that neither Congress nor the president has the right to turn Iranian cash over to the victims of Iranian terrorism, delaying any distribution of the cash until the issue is resolved. The SCOTUS ruling came after Obama took it upon himself to give billions of dollars of frozen funds to the terrorists who seized control from the Shah to whom the money originally belonged.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...an-money-be-turned-over-to-u-s-terror-victims



America

Supreme Court Rules Frozen Iranian Money Be Turned Over To U.S. Terrorism Victims

April 20, 201611:08 AM ET



Eyder Peralta

Rescuers search through the rubble of the U.S. Marine barracks Oct. 23, 1983, in Beirut after a suicide truck bombing. The blast — the single deadliest attack on U.S. forces abroad since World War II — killed 241 American service members. The Supreme Court decided Congress can pass a law compensating the victims, and those of other attacks, using Iranian government funds.

Jim Bourdier/AP

(This post was last updated at 6:55 p.m. EDT.)

The Supreme Court handed Iran's central bank a loss on Wednesday, saying Congress acted constitutionally when it passed a law saying nearly $2 billion in frozen Iranian funds should be turned over to Americans who U.S. courts had found were victims of Iranian terrorist attacks.

The issue here was not whether Iran should pay; instead it was whether Congress had infringed upon the territory of the judiciary by essentially awarding damages.

Here's how NPR's Nina Totenberg explained the case back when it was argued in January:

"In 2012, President Obama froze nearly $2 billion the Iranian central bank had concealed illegally in an account in New York. Congress then amended an existing anti-terrorism law to strengthen it. The new law specified those funds were to be used to pay off the court judgments that found Iran responsible for 19 separate terrorist attacks against Americans around the world."

Sponsor Message

Writing for a 6-2 majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that historically Congress and the executive branch have been given wide latitude on issues of foreign policy, and this is no different.

"By altering the law governing the attachment of particular property belonging to Iran, Congress acted comfortably within the political branches' authority over foreign sovereign immunity and foreign-state assets," Ginsburg wrote.

Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal, dissented. Writing for the two, the chief justice accused Congress of "commandeering the courts to make a political judgment look like a judicial one." The Constitution, he said, "commits the power to decide cases to the Judiciary alone. Yet in this case, Congress arrogated that power to itself," tailoring the law to make sure that one side would win.
 
You claim you know Obama released the Iranian cash to American victims of Iranian terror
I have never said that and your a liar. He had no control over what they did with their own money.



yet you have no knowledge of the facts or details. Your support of your opinion is very weak.
My opinion is supported by evidence. Yours has no support.
 
I have never said that and your a liar. He had no control over what they did with their own money.




My opinion is supported by evidence. Yours has no support.
Obama assumed control over Iranian cash although SCOTUS justices said he had no right to do that.
 
Werbung:
.
June 26, 2025
.
US Democrats played a crooked role in overthrowing the Shah and replacing him with tyrannical religious dictators whose goal is to destroy humanity to force their mythical leader to return to assume control of all nations. That is similar to the key role Obama played in murdering Gaddafi and turning Libya into a terrorist Muslim state.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top