Reply to thread

I think it is generally agreed that Saddam was more bluster than he was a global threat.  For reasons were weak at the time, Bush decided to invade this country. And we are left with the mess today.  Many countries have an army, but after a long war with Iran and then Gulf War I, Saddam's army was mainly a threat to the sectarian groups living within Iraq.

 

For a time after the 9-11 attack, the US to the moral code that the end justifies any means.  In retrospect, considering where Iraq is today - a barely functioning country - the civilians that we killed for the mistaken ideology of neoconservative-ism, must be labeled homicide, not unavoidable war casualties.


Back
Top