from an earlier post of yours:
so, love is secondary, to what?
Oh. Secondary to providing men with a physical need... that women don't have?
Because, of course, women can't be allowed to be able to provide those things for themselves. They have to be cared for, owned if you will, by a man. That is where I got the term "chattel." It fits.
If we have a nice, strong church structure, i.e. a theocracy, then we don't allow those things.
You didn't use the terms "chattel" and "theocracy", but the meaning is quite clear.
How is it then that women in Islamic theocracies who have to depend on men to take care of them not only send their sons off to war, but send them off to be suicide bombers? Are they not concerned about raising children?
or as a suicide bomber.
Sorry, flaja, but your argument has more holes than a piece of Swiss cheese that has been used for target practice.
