From the cited NYT article:
Careful now, this "insider information" thing has backfired on the media before.
"Personally and through surrogates, Clinton has counseled her 1,886 delegates to vote for Obama.."
Really? According to what source? Again, be careful. I just read an article last week that said close to two dozen superdelegates have defected to Clinton from Obama and that the whole thing is still up in the air.
I think this is another attempt of media to carefully word an article to affect a certain outcome in yet another vote to Hillary's detriment...
When she gives a press conference where she herself formally shows us a signed document handing her delegates over to Obama, then I'll believe it. And not a minute before.
All that certainty from the NYT then they cover their spinning butts with this final statement they hope people are too shattered to read by the end:
Really? Then what about the meat of the entire foregoing article. These guys are clever. They've been at it for decades..
