HOW 'BOUT THAT?? "9-11's" ALL ABOUT CHARLIE KIRK, NOW!!!!!

[Phoenix68]

.

.​

 

[the annoying thing]

.

.​

Your a asshole hope you go the same way you think it's funny if it had been Biden would you still say such

 

[the annoying thing]

Yes he was shot by a liberal your happy about it hey scum bag.
Well his ammo and gun has pro trans and anti facist slogan on it so he for sure a cowardly liberal.
***** like this are why Democrats are hated so much violence lent and supported by ***** liberals

 

[mark francis]

.

.​

Democrats are going crazy with anger now that the news cycles are spending a few days on the murder of Kirk before democrats are yet finished with focusing on Floyd's death from drugs while resisting arrest.

 

[mad1961]

It's time to face the truth about Charlie Kirk. Just because he was murdered doesn't make him a saint. This man was a right-wing bomb-throwing racist/sexist, and here we have people arguing about how both sides are this or that when we don't know who the killer was.

So today we're reading a bunch of right-wingers talking about tonight down the rhetoric on both sides, when we see it is primarily the right screaming for revenge and eliminating democrats, while Democrats are saying hw wrng violence is, no matter how much we disagreed with Kirk. Yet we have idiots declaring that both sides are the same.

Charlie Kirk was partly responsible for the current political atmosphere. Now that might hurt some of these right-wingers here, but it's the truth. While he did not deserve to be murdered, he does not deserve to be made into a martyr or deity, nor should we be accusing both sides when Kirk represented how one side promoted hate, violence, and lack of empathy.

It's time REPUBLICANS began to think about the messages they deliver. This is not about both sides, and that's just an inconvenient truth America needs to come to grips with.

 

[mark francis]

It's time to face the truth about Charlie Kirk. Just because he was murdered doesn't make him a saint. This man was a right-wing bomb-throwing racist/sexist, and here we have people arguing about how both sides are this or that when we don't know who the killer was.

So today we're reading a bunch of right-wingers talking about tonight down the rhetoric on both sides, when we see it is primarily the right screaming for revenge and eliminating democrats, while Democrats are saying hw wrng violence is, no matter how much we disagreed with Kirk. Yet we have idiots declaring that both sides are the same.

Charlie Kirk was partly responsible for the current political atmosphere. Now that might hurt some of these right-wingers here, but it's the truth. While he did not deserve to be murdered, he does not deserve to be made into a martyr or deity, nor should we be accusing both sides when Kirk represented how one side promoted hate, violence, and lack of empathy.

It's time REPUBLICANS began to think about the messages they deliver. This is not about both sides, and that's just an inconvenient truth America needs to come to grips with.

I find it interesting that the liberal left hatefully accuse peaceful Americans like Charlie Kirk of inciting violence by simply expressing views that leftist cannot tolerate and are enraged buy those who express them. Democrats are not for free speech but for forced compliance with democrat propaganda and views.

 

[Phoenix68]

It's time to face the truth about Charlie Kirk. Just because he was murdered doesn't make him a saint. This man was a right-wing bomb-throwing racist/sexist, and here we have people arguing about how both sides are this or that....

.
More On False Equivalence: “Both Sides Do It”
June 8, 2015
.​

"When people compare “right-wing hate speech” with “left-wing hate speech”, they’re often talking about two very different things. They redefine incivility as it suits their needs. The “Both Sides Do It” mambo is in fact my favorite type of false equivalence, because it comes in so many varieties, comprising a virtual textbook on false equivalence variations."

.​

 

[mark francis]

.
More On False Equivalence: “Both Sides Do It”
June 8, 2015
.​

"When people compare “right-wing hate speech” with “left-wing hate speech”, they’re often talking about two very different things. They redefine incivility as it suits their needs. The “Both Sides Do It” mambo is in fact my favorite type of false equivalence, because it comes in so many varieties, comprising a virtual textbook on false equivalence variations."

.​

Democrats don't just use violent rhetoric against their enemies; they also engage in violence and murder of those who do not agree with their leftist corruption and degeneracy.

 

[mad1961]

.
More On False Equivalence: “Both Sides Do It”
June 8, 2015
.​

"When people compare “right-wing hate speech” with “left-wing hate speech”, they’re often talking about two very different things. They redefine incivility as it suits their needs. The “Both Sides Do It” mambo is in fact my favorite type of false equivalence, because it comes in so many varieties, comprising a virtual textbook on false equivalence variations."

.​

True, because both sides don't do the same thing. There is only one side with the problem, and it ain't the left.

 

[mad1961]

Democrats don't just use violent rhetoric against their enemies; they also engage in violence and murder of those who do not agree with their leftist corruption and degeneracy.

BS. Racism or white supremacy is degeneracy. And you guys are the ones bombing and killing if you can't have your way. You guys are the ones talking about civil war alll the time. You guys think that you can start a race war and that every white person will fight on your side. All of these things equal degeneracy.

 

[mark francis]

BS. Racism or white supremacy is degeneracy. And you guys are the ones bombing and killing if you can't have your way. You guys are the ones talking about civil war alll the time. You guys think that you can start a race war and that every white person will fight on your side. All of these things equal degeneracy.

What white supremacists are bombing and killing? remember when Obama's pal Bill Ayers was behind this?

What’s misleading in comparisons of Capitol attacks

The one-year anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of former President Donald Trump

www.politifact.com

A far-left group bombed the Capitol in 1983. Here’s how that’s different from the Jan. 6 attack​

 

[mad1961]

Obama was not friends with Ayers, nor did he know him 40-50 years ago.

1-6 was a much larger attack.

"Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives. In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives"

https://a.nwps.fi/306123.pdf

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Obama was an excellent president.

 

[PamiUSA]

It's time to face the truth about Charlie Kirk. Just because he was murdered doesn't make him a saint. This man was a right-wing bomb-throwing racist/sexist, and here we have people arguing about how both sides are this or that when we don't know who the killer was.

So today we're reading a bunch of right-wingers talking about tonight down the rhetoric on both sides, when we see it is primarily the right screaming for revenge and eliminating democrats, while Democrats are saying hw wrng violence is, no matter how much we disagreed with Kirk. Yet we have idiots declaring that both sides are the same.

Charlie Kirk was partly responsible for the current political atmosphere. Now that might hurt some of these right-wingers here, but it's the truth. While he did not deserve to be murdered, he does not deserve to be made into a martyr or deity, nor should we be accusing both sides when Kirk represented how one side promoted hate, violence, and lack of empathy.

It's time REPUBLICANS began to think about the messages they deliver. This is not about both sides, and that's just an inconvenient truth America needs to come to grips with.

You’ll see! And Today, MLK and JFK are rolling over in their graves! MLK would think it’s a disgrace on how, yes, some blacks are killing their own! How divide continues because of people’s opinions! You don’t want to like Kirk, so be it! Your choice! Who are you to judge? We will all be judged! Watch!

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

No one will be judged, that is nonsense.
Charlie Kirk was a bigoted fundamentalist that used logical fallacies galore to delude stupid people.
Yeah, he should not have been assassinated. But that does not mean we are not better off without him.