How do you feel about AI

the annoying thing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2022
Messages
21,363
Location
Florida
This is something we can talk about I hope in a serious way

AI is obviously in it's infincy and for true AI it's my opinion that it will take more advanced systems such as quantum computers. And more perhaps.

I support it's development but have concerns,
about how and who would use it also do you feel there should be some controls , laws, restrictions?
Do you have any concerns about it controlling such things as our power and water supply or control of our military or com systems.
Should it be shared with the world with the same restrictions we place on them .
 
Werbung:
I do have some concerns a out it as with the power of quantum computing its hard to tell what the limits might be .

It reall brings up a lot of questions about it.
 
 
There are an increasing number of AI written clickbait YouTube articles lately. They can be identified by mispronunciations of words and futile attempts at pronouncing abbreviations.
 
A will be useful for many useful and needed applications. But it's being used to create boring clickbait YouTbe articles about "The Ugliest Cars Ever" and such nonsense
 
There has to be an expose on

‘AI’ The Man Behind The Curtain

Ask any AI “is there global warming on any other planets?” They will say yes.

Then proceed to lecture you on manmade global warming on earth. Answering a question not asked. Taking every chance to give a platform to and take a stand on any other issue is not an unbiased, scientifically detached behavior one would expect from a machine.

Perplexity.ai went so far as to say “Yes-other planets can have climate change, but it is usually natural and driven by things like sun light, seasons, axial tilt….” Doesn’t ‘usually’ mean ‘not always’? So, planets, other than earth, have natural climate change but some planets, other than earth, do not have naturally driven climate change.

This is beyond semantics but opposite to the precision we expect from a trusted non-human data source.

Those that program AI admit their answers are from the most submitted sources. Not only those that program AI but also whomever controls ‘consensus’ is AI.
 
I have found AI to be useful in screening potential investments and explaining various investment techniques. I wish AI were better at writing limericks.
 
This is something we can talk about I hope in a serious way

AI is obviously in it's infincy and for true AI it's my opinion that it will take more advanced systems such as quantum computers. And more perhaps.

I support it's development but have concerns,
about how and who would use it also do you feel there should be some controls , laws, restrictions?
Do you have any concerns about it controlling such things as our power and water supply or control of our military or com systems.
Should it be shared with the world with the same restrictions we place on them .
I figure they are supplying their own nuclear power and desalinize their own water if they have to. Who uses it is a mater of free will. My concern is who programs it and points its direction. Competing AIs is a must but ask any AI “is there global warming on any other planets?” They will say "yes" (which is true).

Then proceed to lecture you on manmade global warming on earth. Answering a question not asked. Taking every chance to give a platform to and take a stand on any other issues is not an unbiased, scientifically detached behavior one would expect from a machine.

Perplexity.ai went so far as to say “Yes-other planets can have climate change, but it is usually natural and driven by things like sun light, seasons, axial tilt….” Doesn’t ‘usually’ mean ‘not always’? So, planets, other than earth, have natural climate change but some planets, other than earth, do not have naturally driven climate change.

This is beyond semantics but opposite to the precision we expect from a trusted non-human data source.

Those that program AI admit their answers are from the most submitted sources. Not only those that program AI but also whomever that can overwhelm the input is AI.

There has to be a serious expose

‘AI’ And The Man Behind The Curtain
This is something we can talk about I hope in a serious way

AI is obviously in it's infincy and for true AI it's my opinion that it will take more advanced systems such as quantum computers. And more perhaps.

I support it's development but have concerns,
about how and who would use it also do you feel there should be some controls , laws, restrictions?
Do you have any concerns about it controlling such things as our power and water supply or control of our military or com systems.
Should it be shared with the world with the same restrictions we place on them .
 
Werbung:
It's in its infincy
Leave it to those crooks on Capital Hill & this "it's a Christian Nation" SCOTUS Christiananality human reproduction medical pseudoscience pedophilia more perfect union with flaming flying carpet pseudoscience Federal lynching KKKidnapping churchstate of hate drug trafficking fiefdom where having lunch to be attacked by Klues Klucks duh Klans "death to the infidels" isn't much different from having Klues Klucks duh Klans "who painted a stippled epoxy swastika" on a radiation containment door while not even being aware of the act in losing employment & a girlfriend as a future wife according to one nation under God with no equal justice under AI law.......
 
Last edited:
Back
Top