Reply to thread

I don't see a reason that a drug can't be developed that would simply prevent ovulation.  If abortion is no longer legal, there will be a profit motive for developing the "perfect" contraceptive.




Do you really believe that parent's financial position or the fact that the child "MIGHT" not be well taken care of is a valid reason to kill?




I have no problem at all with lowering the boom on deadbeat dads.  If the child is theirs, they can be made to shoulder part of the burden or live in abject poverty for the remainder of their lives.




Are any of these reasons valid reasons to kill an innocent human being?




There is a party that deserves the full force of the law directed at them, but the one you are talking about killing isn't that one.  She can certainly give up the child to someone who will take care of it.




Is that a valid reason to kill?  Maybe men will think twice if they know that there is nearly a 100% chance that they will be made to financer their share of the consequences of their actions.




By all means add to the list but at the end of each addition, the one making the addition should state whether or not he or she believes that the reason is a valid reason to kill another human being and offer up an argument to justify that position.





Women are a powerful force in the political world now.  If abortion is no longer an option, terrible pressure will be placed on men to share the cost of their children.  Pressure both political and financial will be laid on pharmaceutical companies to develop better contraceptives.  When the fact of really facing the consequences of one's actions sinks in, I'll wager that the numbers of casual sexual encounters will drop and the incidence of STD's will drop accordingly.  Face it Coyote, nothing but good can come from people facing the consequences of their actions.


Back
Top