Reply to thread

When did I ever say that?  Following your logic, infants should not enjoy the protection of the law because they certainly aren't intelligent and won't be for quite some time.  In fact, the presence of a brain does not indicate intelligence at all.  The bulk of the brain's job is to regulate the body's systems, and interpret input from nerves, not to act as a seat for inteligence.


But if you believe that you have a point, in that without intelligence it is not a human being, I invite you to provide some credible science that states that the offspring of two human beings is EVER anything but a human being.


To this point, you have seemed quite reasonable but the argument you have just put forward puts that reason into question.


Back
Top