You are obviously not familiar with either the constitution or how our legal system works.
Is that what I said? If I said that, then bring the words forward.
Clearly you have never read the Roe decision. You may google it for the parts that the pro choice crowd likes, but you clearly haven't read it. Justice Blackmun hinged the entire decision on the personhood of the unborn. He said:
"If the suggestion of personhood is established, the case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the 14th Amendment.’”
That "suggestion" has not only been established, but there is a growing body of precedent to support it and the number of individuals who sit in jail today for killing an unborn is growing all the time. You can only be charged for murder or manslaughter if you kill a person.
Refer to any legal dictionary. The definition you will find for "person" is "a human being" Since it is no longer debatable (with any credibility anyway) that unborns are not human beings, it stands to reason that they are persons.
The majority are as uneducated as you. So what? In the eyes of the law, if you are a human being, you are a person. It is as simple as that. When Roe was decided an argument could be made that the unborn were not human beings. That argument is no longer possible.
And I repeat, that if parrotting that abortion is legal is the best defense you can muster, then you really shouldn't be arguing at all. If you are arguing pro choice, you should be able to defend thier decision, not just endlessly repeat it.
