-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
If we had not spent over
- Thread starter the annoying thing
- Start date
Werbung:
No one but you and Trump are claiming that. Btw mtg claims the gov controls the climate and sends disasters to republican areas. I bet you swallow that crap with glee too.
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
money was used from fema for illegals you may not like it but its true why do you lie so much.
That is a distraction from the main topic.
You are right, fema money was used for immigrants but not exclusively as some imply by omission. And fema did NOT use weather disaster money in order to house immigrants as the liar Trump has claimed repeatedly. To your credit you did not claim that above.
But you do imply wrongly that some here have claimed fema did not use money for immigrants. Do you have a quote on that?
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
iT WAS GABE i THINK. i\M NOT LOOKING IT UP TO PLEASE YOU
I am sorry if I annoyed you. I promise you will never annoy me if you ask me to substantiate my claims.
Perhaps it is possible that someone inadvertently implied that no fema money was used to house immigrants instead of claiming no fema disaster money has been used to house immigrants. But it is very clear that we all know that fema has been used to house immigrants. That was not an issue until the liar trump claimed disaster money was used to house immigrants and Trump sycophants started a thread here and keep pushing the same lie.
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
hes right you know 150 billion a year plus thats a lot of dimes dumb ass
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
now the thread was about what you would of spent the money on . Seems not ! liberal know what they would spend it on. only to deny we do and try and hijack the thread,
Typical leftwing weasel tactic.
Its not a hard question except for liberals,
Assuming we eventually get a president, who has some degree of responsibility and will have a actual balance budget with no overspending.
.half would go to paying down the debt .
we pay
Net interest payments on the U.S. national debt are estimated to total $395.5 billion this fiscal year, which is 6.8% of all federal outlays1. In 2023, the federal government spent $658 billion on net interest costs on the national debt, the largest amount ever spent on interest in the budget2. Over the next decade, interest payments on the national debt are projected to total $12.9 trillion3.
Learn more:.
395 billion a year we could make good use of that interest money.
Well I still have 300 million to spend.
I would spend the rest on a split some would go to help disabled vets , some would go to creating affordable public housing .
lastly I would devote some helping disabled senior's and disabled who are able to live on their but need some help with medical bills .
Typical leftwing weasel tactic.
Its not a hard question except for liberals,
Assuming we eventually get a president, who has some degree of responsibility and will have a actual balance budget with no overspending.
.half would go to paying down the debt .
we pay
Net interest payments on the U.S. national debt are estimated to total $395.5 billion this fiscal year, which is 6.8% of all federal outlays1. In 2023, the federal government spent $658 billion on net interest costs on the national debt, the largest amount ever spent on interest in the budget2. Over the next decade, interest payments on the national debt are projected to total $12.9 trillion3.
Learn more:.
395 billion a year we could make good use of that interest money.
Well I still have 300 million to spend.
I would spend the rest on a split some would go to help disabled vets , some would go to creating affordable public housing .
lastly I would devote some helping disabled senior's and disabled who are able to live on their but need some help with medical bills .
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
I assume every one would try to do what they think is best wit it,I would prefer to pay it all on our debt but would have to help citizens who truly need help.
Prove that money was used improperly and should have been used elsewhere. Fema has many missions not just disaster relief mooron
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
yes I know that dumb ass . but some was spent on illegals and that is a fact
Americans were rightly angered by the announcement by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Wednesday that the Federal Emergency Management Agency "[does] not have the funds" to make it through the hurricane season, particularly in light of the over $600 million it spent "migrant services" this past fiscal year.
In fact, the Shelter and Services Program administered by FEMA in partnership with the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol has spent more than $1 billion on noncitizen migrant resettlement and other services over the past two years, according to FEMA's website.
Yes fema has many missions including helping all humans living in the US
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 29,614
The many reports on the supposed benefits undocumented immigrants provide to society seem to overlook the major inconvenient truth that undocumented immigrants are not legally allowed to work in the US and Americans who hire illegals can be charged with breaking the law.
Can Undocumented Immigrants Get a Work Permit in the US? - Documented
Did you know that while undocumented immigrants are not authorized as workers in the US, they are still protected under labor law?
documentedny.com
Can Undocumented Immigrants Get a Work Permit in the US?
Federal law requires an immigrant to have an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), or work permit, to lawfully work in the states. Undocumented immigrants are not eligible due to their immigration status. Some other classes of immigrants legally allowed to be in the U.S. are also not permitted to work, such as tourist visa holders.
However, to sustain themselves, undocumented workers have started to work in the cash economy, also known as “under the table” or “off the books.” We spoke with experts on immigration law and labor laws to learn the rights protecting undocumented workers in New York.
What happens if I get caught working under the table?
An employer must use form I-9 to verify that an individual is eligible to work in the United States. The employer can face criminal charges, as much as $3,000 per hire, for employing unauthorized workers.mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 29,614
There are laws protecting American jobs from competition from foreigners not allowed to take those jobs from Americans but democrats don't honor laws protecting many poor Americans like that.
Werbung:
So you can't deny the report economically lolThe many reports on the supposed benefits undocumented immigrants provide to society seem to overlook the major inconvenient truth that undocumented immigrants are not legally allowed to work in the US and Americans who hire illegals can be charged with breaking the law.
Can Undocumented Immigrants Get a Work Permit in the US? - Documented
Did you know that while undocumented immigrants are not authorized as workers in the US, they are still protected under labor law?
Can Undocumented Immigrants Get a Work Permit in the US?
Federal law requires an immigrant to have an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), or work permit, to lawfully work in the states. Undocumented immigrants are not eligible due to their immigration status. Some other classes of immigrants legally allowed to be in the U.S. are also not permitted to work, such as tourist visa holders.
However, to sustain themselves, undocumented workers have started to work in the cash economy, also known as “under the table” or “off the books.” We spoke with experts on immigration law and labor laws to learn the rights protecting undocumented workers in New York.
What happens if I get caught working under the table?
An employer must use form I-9 to verify that an individual is eligible to work in the United States. The employer can face criminal charges, as much as $3,000 per hire, for employing unauthorized workers.
