Is this the 1st time in history that Americans were afraid to freely speak our minds?

[Boris Norris]

You claim I don't understand, but you do not answer the question, possibly because you do not know the answer. Obama claimed the money he gave Iran was the money the Shah had invested.

Obama was right. You originally said it was taxpayers money and you were wrong and still are.

but the SCOTUS said that money was not to go to Iran but to the American victims of Iranian atrocities.

The SC didn't have the call on where it went and the fact it didn't proved that.

 

[mark francis]

Obama was right. You originally said it was taxpayers money and you were wrong and still are.

The SC didn't have the call on where it went and the fact it didn't proved that.

Yes, Obama took taxpayer money from American victims of Iranian terror and sent it to the Iranian terrorists. Ane the moronic Democrat party is charging Trump with treason. Go figger.

 

[Boris Norris]

Yes, Obama took taxpayer money from American victims of Iranian terror and sent it to the Iranian terrorists. Ane the moronic Democrat party is charging Trump with treason. Go figger.

Wrong again dickhead.
Trump will be trialed and go to jail because he's guilty.
Obama did nothing wrong just because you hate him.

 

[Yo Daddy!!]

Yes, Obama took taxpayer money from American victims of Iranian terror and sent it to the Iranian terrorists. Ane the moronic Democrat party is charging Trump with treason. Go figger.

Well, I figger it might ALLLLLL stem from their desire to throw off their seeming predetermined roles as "Wingmen."

 

[mark francis]

Wrong again dickhead.
Trump will be trialed and go to jail because he's guilty.
Obama did nothing wrong just because you hate him.

And you still cannot tell the truth about the money Obama stole and split with American-killing Iranian terrorists.

 

[Yo Daddy!!]

And you still cannot tell the truth about the money Obama stole and split with American-killing Iranian terrorists.

Of course not.

THE LYING AND CENSORING MEDIA hasn't told him of it.

 

[pjmret]

Of course not.

THE LYING AND CENSORING MEDIA hasn't told him of it.

can YOU point me to credible verified facts about money that obama "stole"?

 

[mark francis]

can YOU point me to credible verified facts about money that obama "stole"?

Obama should have consulted Congress or courts before he decided on his own to give billions of dollars to the most destructive terrorist thugs in the world. Congressional staffers could have told him to hold off because of unresolved liens the US had against the Iranian murderers. And the court could have instructed him that no money was owed to the thugs who stole power from the shah and were now seeking to steal all his assets and investments.

There was far more to this issue that Obama was apparently aware of or thinking about.


US courts say Iran owes terrorism victims billions. That's an obstacle to a new Iran nuclear deal. - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (thebulletin.org) 8-3-21

US courts say Iran owes terrorism victims billions. That’s an obstacle to a new Iran nuclear deal.

By Christopher A. Bidwell | August 3, 2021

...
Diplomatic agreements between the United States and Iran cannot magically erase or settle these judgment liens. When previous administrations have attempted to intercede in US court cases by claiming executive privilege or sole authority to negotiate agreements with foreign countries, they have been rebuffed.

Furthermore, plaintiffs in these cases understandably elicit sympathy. They are often injured military service members or families of dead service members who suffered from Iranian-sponsored terrorist acts such as the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon and more recently its furnishing of improvised explosive devices to terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan. American families of innocent civilians and individuals who were killed or severely injured in Iranian-sponsored terrorist attacks also hold a significant percentage of these judgments. Politicians and senior US officials could face significant backlash if they interfered with judgment award collections or attempted to satisfy these claims with US tax dollars. ...

For the JCPOA or any new deal to succeed, the United States will need to articulate a path forward that addresses these outstanding claims. ...

Given the tens of billions of dollars in liens against Iran, the United States may not be able to propose a solution that satisfies all of the judgments in one fell swoop. It might, however, propose that Iran pay a percentage of the proceeds from expanded energy royalties over the course of a five- or ten-year period, after which Iran could come off the list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. ...

The fund could be overseen by a special master—an official appointed by a judge to ensure that a court order is followed—who could settle the claims of victims and their families.

 

[pjmret]

Obama should have consulted Congress or courts before he decided on his own to give billions of dollars to the most destructive terrorist thugs in the world. Congressional staffers could have told him to hold off because of unresolved liens the US had against the Iranian murderers. And the court could have instructed him that no money was owed to the thugs who stole power from the shah and were now seeking to steal all his assets and investments.

There was far more to this issue that Obama was apparently aware of or thinking about.


US courts say Iran owes terrorism victims billions. That's an obstacle to a new Iran nuclear deal. - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (thebulletin.org) 8-3-21

US courts say Iran owes terrorism victims billions. That’s an obstacle to a new Iran nuclear deal.

By Christopher A. Bidwell | August 3, 2021

...
Diplomatic agreements between the United States and Iran cannot magically erase or settle these judgment liens. When previous administrations have attempted to intercede in US court cases by claiming executive privilege or sole authority to negotiate agreements with foreign countries, they have been rebuffed.

Furthermore, plaintiffs in these cases understandably elicit sympathy. They are often injured military service members or families of dead service members who suffered from Iranian-sponsored terrorist acts such as the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon and more recently its furnishing of improvised explosive devices to terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan. American families of innocent civilians and individuals who were killed or severely injured in Iranian-sponsored terrorist attacks also hold a significant percentage of these judgments. Politicians and senior US officials could face significant backlash if they interfered with judgment award collections or attempted to satisfy these claims with US tax dollars. ...

For the JCPOA or any new deal to succeed, the United States will need to articulate a path forward that addresses these outstanding claims. ...

Given the tens of billions of dollars in liens against Iran, the United States may not be able to propose a solution that satisfies all of the judgments in one fell swoop. It might, however, propose that Iran pay a percentage of the proceeds from expanded energy royalties over the course of a five- or ten-year period, after which Iran could come off the list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. ...

The fund could be overseen by a special master—an official appointed by a judge to ensure that a court order is followed—who could settle the claims of victims and their families.

so first you claim he "stole" it (an illegal action) now you whine he should have talked about it first? totally different.

god hates when you lie

 

[mark francis]

so first you claim he "stole" it (an illegal action) now you whine he should have talked about it first? totally different.

god hates when you lie

No, he had no right to take money that was not his and give it to Muslim terrorists to whom it did not belong.

 

[Boris Norris]

And you still cannot tell the truth about the money Obama stole and split with American-killing Iranian terrorists.

Again, he did not steal anything and you know it.
He had no input into how Iran distributed their money. Judges had no permission to make recommendations. It wasn't a legal issue.

 

[mark francis]

Again, he did not steal anything and you know it.
He had no input into how Iran distributed their money. Judges had no permission to make recommendations. It wasn't a legal issue.

You say he did not steal because he said that of himself, but he has never provided justification for giving American tax dollars to American murderers and never will show from where the money supposedly came and for what reason he took it.

 

[Boris Norris]

You say he did not steal because he said that of himself, but he has never provided justification for giving American tax dollars to American murderers and never will show from where the money supposedly came and for what reason he took it.

Fuck off. He we go again that everything has to go through a republican stacked court to get your approval.

 

[mark francis]

Fuck off. He we go again that everything has to go through a republican stacked court to get your approval.

Just show us where Obama got the money and why he thought he was supposed to share the money with murderous terrorist Muslim thugs in Iran.

 

[Boris Norris]

Just show us where Obama got the money and why he thought he was supposed to share the money with murderous terrorist Muslim thugs in Iran.

Not that this will change your mind you blockhead.

Obama Didn't Give Iran '150 Billion in Cash' - FactCheck.org

A viral meme distorts the facts about the Iran nuclear agreement. The deal, approved by six countries and the European Union, gave Iran access to its own frozen assets.

www.factcheck.org