Just as I said not guilty

[the annoying thing]

Well, he will not be punished for what was clearly an accident.
I think we can be sure that in the future, props managers and actors will be much more careful with guns.
That is a good thing.

That's what I have said all along. They could of attempted a neglect manslaughter charge but even any lawyer she uld have it dismissed or found not guilty if they pursued it .

 

[Tripoli]

Actually the case was dismissed on technical grounds
Is that what you predicted?
He wasn't found not guilty

The prosecutor admitted guilt in hiding evidence, so will she be tried?

 

[pjmret]

Were you guilty

Nope
You haven't been found not guilty of murder

 

[pjmret]

The prosecutor admitted guilt in hiding evidence, so will she be tried?

Was it illegal?

 

[Tripoli]

Was it illegal?

Yes not disclosing evidence is illegal. just like your mother keeping you in the shed for all those years

 

[pjmret]

Yes not disclosing evidence is illegal. just like your mother keeping you in the shed for all those years

Then we will see

 

[Tripoli]

Then we will see

WE will see the prosecutor not charged because breaking the law for prosecutors is a daily event

 

[pjmret]

WE will see the prosecutor not charged because breaking the law for prosecutors is a daily event

maybe so. feel free to write your local congressman or call the fbi if this bothers you a lot

 

[the annoying thing]

Yes not disclosing evidence is illegal. just like your mother keeping you in the shed for all those years

Hey she gave him a blanket a chair a bowel for his water and a chair to sit on .and a candle for light.

 

[pjmret]

Yes not disclosing evidence is illegal. just like your mother keeping you in the shed for all those years

Baldwin’s attorneys asked the judge to dismiss the case after it was revealed that Troy Teske, a former police officer and friend of Gutierrez-Reed’s stepfather, delivered Colt .45-caliber rounds to the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office on March 6 (the day of Gutierrez-Reed’s conviction).

Defense attorneys said they should have been told about the rounds.

Morrissey argued that the disputed ammunition was not linked to the case or hidden from Baldwin’s lawyers.

“There is no reason to believe that the evidence that we discussed in court today was related to the set of ‘Rust,’” Morrissey said after the case was dismissed. She said she disagreed with the judge’s decision but respected it.


that doesn't sound like an illegal action, but a judgement call the judge disagreed with.

feel free to post credible legal opinions that the prosecutor committed a crime.

 

[Tripoli]

Baldwin’s attorneys asked the judge to dismiss the case after it was revealed that Troy Teske, a former police officer and friend of Gutierrez-Reed’s stepfather, delivered Colt .45-caliber rounds to the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office on March 6 (the day of Gutierrez-Reed’s conviction).

Defense attorneys said they should have been told about the rounds.

Morrissey argued that the disputed ammunition was not linked to the case or hidden from Baldwin’s lawyers.

“There is no reason to believe that the evidence that we discussed in court today was related to the set of ‘Rust,’” Morrissey said after the case was dismissed. She said she disagreed with the judge’s decision but respected it.


that doesn't sound like an illegal action, but a judgement call the judge disagreed with.

feel free to post credible legal opinions that the prosecutor committed a crime.

Not disclosing all evidence is a crime that the judge could not be part of so she ripped the prosecutors new assholes one of which resigned as soon as the evidence was disclosed

 

[Stray Bullet]

Anyone other than a famous person wouldn’t have gotten a case dismissed so quickly. The judge is in his pocket probably.

 

[pjmret]

Not disclosing all evidence is a crime that the judge could not be part of so she ripped the prosecutors new assholes one of which resigned as soon as the evidence was disclosed

again, it sounds like a judgement call, not a crime.
resigning isn't proof of a crime.

A special prosecutor who resigned from the manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin on Friday said she did so because she felt it should have been voluntarily dismissed by the state.

and she didn't resign because of the evidence miscue

but post a credible legal opinion confirming your worthless one.

 

[Tripoli]

again, it sounds like a judgement call, not a crime.
resigning isn't proof of a crime.

A special prosecutor who resigned from the manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin on Friday said she did so because she felt it should have been voluntarily dismissed by the state.

and she didn't resign because of the evidence miscue

but post a credible legal opinion confirming your worthless one.

Section 1424.5 - Withholding of evidence by prosecuting attorney; violation; hearing; penalty(a)(1) Upon receiving information that a prosecuting attorney may have deliberately and intentionally withheld relevant, material exculpatory evidence or information in violation of law, a court may make a finding, supported by clear and convincing evidence, that a violation occurred. If the court finds such a violation, the court shall inform the State Bar of California of that violation if the prosecuting attorney acted in bad faith and the impact of the withholding contributed to a guilty verdict, guilty or nolo contendere plea, or, if identified before conclusion of trial, seriously limited the ability of a defendant to present a defense.(2) A court may hold a hearing to consider whether a violation occurred pursuant to paragraph (1).(b)(1) If a court finds, pursuant to subdivision (a), that a violation occurred in bad faith, the court may disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney from a case.(2) Upon a determination by a court to disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney pursuant to paragraph (1), the defendant or his or her counsel may file and serve a notice of a motion pursuant to Section 1424 to disqualify the prosecuting attorney's office if there is sufficient evidence that other employees of the prosecuting attorney's office knowingly and in bad faith participated in or sanctioned the intentional withholding of the relevant, material exculpatory evidence or information and that withholding is part of a pattern and practice of violations.(c) This section does not limit the authority or discretion of, or any requirement placed upon, the court or other individuals to make reports to the State Bar of California regarding the same conduct, or otherwise limit other available legal authority, requirements, remedies, or actions.

Yawning at the shitforbrains legal asshole

 

[pjmret]

Section 1424.5 - Withholding of evidence by prosecuting attorney; violation; hearing; penalty(a)(1) Upon receiving information that a prosecuting attorney may have deliberately and intentionally withheld relevant, material exculpatory evidence or information in violation of law, a court may make a finding, supported by clear and convincing evidence, that a violation occurred. If the court finds such a violation, the court shall inform the State Bar of California of that violation if the prosecuting attorney acted in bad faith and the impact of the withholding contributed to a guilty verdict, guilty or nolo contendere plea, or, if identified before conclusion of trial, seriously limited the ability of a defendant to present a defense.(2) A court may hold a hearing to consider whether a violation occurred pursuant to paragraph (1).(b)(1) If a court finds, pursuant to subdivision (a), that a violation occurred in bad faith, the court may disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney from a case.(2) Upon a determination by a court to disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney pursuant to paragraph (1), the defendant or his or her counsel may file and serve a notice of a motion pursuant to Section 1424 to disqualify the prosecuting attorney's office if there is sufficient evidence that other employees of the prosecuting attorney's office knowingly and in bad faith participated in or sanctioned the intentional withholding of the relevant, material exculpatory evidence or information and that withholding is part of a pattern and practice of violations.(c) This section does not limit the authority or discretion of, or any requirement placed upon, the court or other individuals to make reports to the State Bar of California regarding the same conduct, or otherwise limit other available legal authority, requirements, remedies, or actions.

Yawning at the shitforbrains legal asshole

DELIBERATELY withheld. doesn't sound DELIBERATE, ****** lol.

as i said, post a credible legal opinion by SOMEONE ELSE. YOUR opinion is worthless. duh.

god you are a legal shtforbrains a**hole. lol