Lending carefully to the desired people

david123

New Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
1
Real estate loans didn’t have many takers after the housing bubble burst in the United States. Actually it was this housing bubble that kindled the financial turmoil that has now engulfed the whole world. Also with the burst of the housing bubble, banks had second thoughts before sanctioning a house loans and real estate loans. This has happened because the property prices have fallen to levels that are unthinkable just a few years ago. Also, with the continuing recession in the American economy and in other economies of the developed world, a fast recovery is unlikely in the short run.

In spite of the scores of incentives and other concessions, a major recovery is not evident. The economic stimulus package declared by the Obama government has gone mostly to the major players. In such a situation, it is interesting to note that the small players like LoanMax managed by the famous banker rod aycox are posting profits even after lending money for real estate and home loans.

Analysts are studying as to how such a situation actually came about. Through better management practices and also by retaining talent, the LoanMax Inc has achieved impressive results. Almost all the prominent customers that availed loans had to provide security in one form or the other, but the one fact that LoanMax Inc emphasized upon is as to how this money is spent by the borrower.

One of the main reasons for the present turmoil in the American financial market is that the prominent banks and the lending institutions did not care about the antecedents of the people availing a loan. The main reason for the collapse of the banking giant Lehman Brothers is due to their liberal attitude towards lending to people with dubious financial credentials. If the Lehman Brothers would have been careful enough, they would not have fallen into the mess they are in at present.
 
Werbung:
The banking industry are more punks to the government than communication, but nonetheless, they do perform a service. My point being, whatever's right in banking is not acknowledged as a superlative - perhaps in practice it's never realized anyway - but the idea is that 'if they'd just give people a chance more often, maybe take a hit here or there, but we can pay 'em back for that' and so forth. In that we're asking a bank to act as less than a bank and achieve more than effective banking. No wonder it worked out so well.
 
Back
Top