Long history of leftist corruption in the US

[Boris Norris]

Richard Dawkins is a pompous blowhard with insane disrespect for God and Christians.

Blowhard he is not. He can support every word he says. Why should he have respect for a god that doesn't exist? Only fools like you do that.
You've got a mental illness.

Ben Stein asked questions of Dawkins that revealed Dawkins to be a simple-minded speculator in some areas of science (aliens brought life to earth indeed! Sheesh.

Dawkins has never said that in public or anywhere I can find it. Prove it please.

! Dawkins the science fiction propagator!) because atheism has left him incapable of understanding matters of science that cannot be divorced from God.

 

[mark francis]

Blowhard he is not. He can support every word he says. Why should he have respect for a god that doesn't exist? Only fools like you do that.
You've got a mental illness.

Dawkins has never said that in public or anywhere I can find it. Prove it please.

Sure. The ***** can prove aliens, not God, were involved with the origin of life on earth? I think not. He is a clown.

 

[Boris Norris]

Richard Dawkins is a pompous blowhard with insane disrespect for God and Christians. Ben Stein asked questions of Dawkins that revealed Dawkins to be a simple-minded speculator in some areas of science (aliens brought life to earth indeed! Sheesh! Dawkins the science fiction propagator!) because atheism has left him incapable of understanding matters of science that cannot be divorced from God.

And show us exactly which matters of science which cannot be divorced from god? Include the evidence.

Faith is defined as believing something without evidence. That's you.
Science insists there is evidence before anything is believed. That's Dawkins.

Only ignorant tools like you would categorise him as a fool. Your problem is he continues to expose what a fraud you and your filthy religion is.

You have no evidence of anything. Nothing. Pure unadulterated bullshit.

 

[Boris Norris]

Sure. The ***** can prove aliens, not God, were involved with the origin of life on earth? I think not. He is a clown.

Again, show where he proved aliens were involved. I know you can't and you are lying again. You're the one making a clown of yourself. At least I'm laughing. Idiot.

Does god know you are a bloody liar? When did you go to confession last?

 

[Phoenix68]

Richard Dawkins is a pompous blowhard with insane disrespect for God and Christians.

.

.​

"Dawkins is well known for his criticism of creationism and intelligent design as well as for being a vocal atheist. Dawkins wrote The Blind Watchmaker in 1986, arguing against the watchmaker analogy, an argument for the existence of a supernatural creator based upon the complexity of living organisms. Instead, he describes evolutionary processes as analogous to a blind watchmaker, in that reproduction, mutation, and selection are unguided by any sentient designer. In 2006, Dawkins published The God Delusion, contending that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that religious faith is a delusion. He founded the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science in 2006."​

​

 

[Phoenix68]

And show us exactly which matters of science which cannot be divorced from god? Include the evidence.

.
God Is Impossible
.
View attachment 3415​

 

[mark francis]

And show us exactly which matters of science which cannot be divorced from god? Include the evidence.

Faith is defined as believing something without evidence. That's you.
Science insists there is evidence before anything is believed. That's Dawkins.

Only ignorant tools like you would categorise him as a fool. Your problem is he continues to expose what a fraud you and your filthy religion is.

You have no evidence of anything. Nothing. Pure unadulterated bullshit.

Dawkins believes with all the faith he can muster that something must have sparked original life on earth, even though he has no clue what that was and refuses to consider the possibility of involvement from the God he knows nothing about.

 

[mark francis]

.
View attachment 3414
.​

"Dawkins is well known for his criticism of creationism and intelligent design as well as for being a vocal atheist. Dawkins wrote The Blind Watchmaker in 1986, arguing against the watchmaker analogy, an argument for the existence of a supernatural creator based upon the complexity of living organisms. Instead, he describes evolutionary processes as analogous to a blind watchmaker, in that reproduction, mutation, and selection are unguided by any sentient designer. In 2006, Dawkins published The God Delusion, contending that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that religious faith is a delusion. He founded the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science in 2006."

​

Ben Stein did an excellent job of exposing the sheer speculatory nature of Dawkins' entire religious philosophy.

 

[Phoenix68]

Dawkins believes with all the faith he can muster that something must have sparked original life on earth.....

.

.​

"The hot, dense conditions in the first 20 minutes after the big bang produced only hydrogen and helium along with a tiny trace of lithium (one in 10 billion atoms) and a negligible abundance of heavier elements. But, life as we know it requires water and organic compounds, whose existence had to wait until the first stars fused hydrogen and helium into oxygen and carbon in their interiors about 50 million years later. The initial bottleneck for life was not a suitable temperature, as it is today, but rather the production of the essential elements.​

​

 

[mark francis]

.
View attachment 3418
.​

"The hot, dense conditions in the first 20 minutes after the big bang produced only hydrogen and helium along with a tiny trace of lithium (one in 10 billion atoms) and a negligible abundance of heavier elements. But, life as we know it requires water and organic compounds, whose existence had to wait until the first stars fused hydrogen and helium into oxygen and carbon in their interiors about 50 million years later. The initial bottleneck for life was not a suitable temperature, as it is today, but rather the production of the essential elements.

​

I hope you are aware that the proposed scenario is just speculation that God-rejectors desperately want to someday somehow prove to be legitimate science.

 

[Boris Norris]

Dawkins believes with all the faith he can muster that something must have sparked original life on earth

Exactly. At this point there are plausible scenarios but science hasn't stopped research.
Your Bible has the answer to everything in life that will ever be encountered, answer every question ever posed yet has no evidence of any god. The same god no one else has evidence for. You are a gullible fool.

, even though he has no clue what that was and refuses to consider the possibility of involvement from the God he knows nothing about.

Why would he entertain the ridiculous theory some supernatural dictatorship did it? Where's the evidence dickhead? You certainly haven't shown how god did it. Just like the Bible said it did and you believe it.
Did you learn anything at school?

Here's one. Who was taking notes when god met Adam? Seems to be a detailed record of the conversation but no author.

 

[mark francis]

Exactly. At this point there are plausible scenarios but science hasn't stopped research.
Your Bible has the answer to everything in life that will ever be encountered, answer every question ever posed yet has no evidence of any god. The same god no one else has evidence for. You are a gullible fool.


Why would he entertain the ridiculous theory some supernatural dictatorship did it? Where's the evidence dickhead? You certainly haven't shown how god did it. Just like the Bible said it did and you believe it.
Did you learn anything at school?

Here's one. Who was taking notes when god met Adam? Seems to be a detailed record of the conversation but no author.

Science has presented irrefutable evidence that intelligent design was behind the origin of life on earth, as even radical atheist Richard Dawkins was forced to admit.

 

[Boris Norris]

Science has presented irrefutable evidence that intelligent design was behind the origin of life on earth, as even radical atheist Richard Dawkins was forced to admit.

Again. Show your evidence or you are a liar.

 

[mark francis]

Again. Show your evidence or you are a liar.

No. If you claim I am wrong then back up your own claim.

 

[Boris Norris]

Science has presented irrefutable evidence that intelligent design was behind the origin of life on earth, as even radical atheist Richard Dawkins was forced to admit.

In fact, here is the proof you are a liar. So piss off and don't return unless you know what your talking about.

Intelligent Design vs. Evolution | Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science

Discussion by: zifn4bI hope that Mr. Dawkins himself can help me with this dilemma. I have spent a substantial amount of time pondering the Intelligent Design and Evolution concepts to try to form my own world view and (perhaps naively) hope to discover some real truth. The one thing that ...

richarddawkins.net