McCain top adviser invested in porn

Popeye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
3,023
Location
Washington state
That would be McCain senior economic adviser Phil " a nation of whiners" Gramm. It must have been another case of "Republican family values" at work.

3288842-m.jpg



Gramm's journey into porn began in 1973, when his brother-in-law, George Caton, rushed to tell him about an exciting low-budget soft-core production called "Truck Stop Women." A promo poster for the film boasted of its buxom stars: "No Rig Was Too Big For Them To Handle." Caton, who was in charge of fundraising for the production, asked Gramm to become an investor. To entice his brother-in-law, Caton showed him scenes of Playboy Playmate of the year Claudia Jennings displaying her bare essentials (she is naked throughout much of the film).

These scenes "really got Phil titillated," Caton told journalist John Judis in 1995.
Gramm enthusiastically cut Caton a check for $15,000. Because the film was oversold, however, Caton returned his brother-in-law's money, offering him an investment opportunity in an upcoming feature.

The following year, Gramm sent Caton a check for $15,000, this time to finance the production of "Beauty Queens," a soft-core flick about pageant judges having sex with contestants. But at the last moment, the director of "Beauty Queens," Mark Lester, decided to shelve his production to make the sequel to his "Tricia's Wedding," a comedy starring the drag queen troupe, The Cockettes.

Gramm contributed at least $7500 towards the sequel, a satire of the Nixon White House called "White House Madness" that featured the crazed president wandering around the White House in the nude. Gramm never saw that money again. Shot in ten days on a soundstage crudely modeled after the Oval Office, "White House Madness" tanked at the box office.

Like the rest of Gramm's endeavors, his soft-core porn career was a complete disaster.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/phil-gramm-may-be-gone-bu_b_112781.html
 
Werbung:
It must have been another case of "Republican family values" at work.

......indeed, send the kiddies off to school arrange the flowers in the hall then get out the whips and chains slip on the stockings and slap the neighbours wife's botty until its a nice ripe rosey pink and then get to work with the 12" black ribbed 12 speed rotating head vibrator made of the finest quality latex with of course.....tah dah.....the little boatman tickler for that sensuous finish.........and a cup of joe to finish whist discussing todays recipies...

Utilitarian porn for Stepford republicans :D:D
 
......indeed, send the kiddies off to school arrange the flowers in the hall then get out the whips and chains slip on the stockings and slap the neighbours wife's botty until its a nice ripe rosey pink and then get to work with the 12" black ribbed 12 speed rotating head vibrator made of the finest quality latex with of course.....tah dah.....the little boatman tickler for that sensuous finish.........and a cup of joe to finish whist discussing todays recipies...

Utilitarian porn for Stepford republicans

:D:D This is probably the funniest and most disturbing thing I have read on this site in a long while, Thanks! :D:D
 
Odd how when a former president made the oval office into a porn show, it was not a big deal, unimportant, and part of a private life. Yet here it's news worthy of consideration for someone not running for office?

I wager most of the libs here likely bought similar stupid porn shows. Can you say hypocrites? How about you walk the walk, before talking the talk, eh?
 
Odd how when a former president made the oval office into a porn show, it was not a big deal, unimportant, and part of a private life. Yet here it's news worthy of consideration for someone not running for office?

I wager most of the libs here likely bought similar stupid porn shows. Can you say hypocrites? How about you walk the walk, before talking the talk, eh?

a porn show in teh white house? wtf you talking bout? Ooo you mean before Repblicans decided to ask all the details , like where they did it, how , what toys they used, what his **** looked liked....no when it was him it was away from view and not in public....

You act like Bill was the first to ever get some on the side in office lol grow up man.
 
a porn show in teh white house? wtf you talking bout? Ooo you mean before Repblicans decided to ask all the details , like where they did it, how , what toys they used, what his **** looked liked....no when it was him it was away from view and not in public....

You act like Bill was the first to ever get some on the side in office lol grow up man.

Ok, so why is your side bringing up this, I guess from your perspective, irrelevant topic? Lead by example. If it didn't matter before, why does it matter now? Oh wait, this isn't a liberal democrat, so now sex is very important huh?

Say it with me... Partisan Hypocrite.

In fact, the more I think about it, the more hypocritical it is. Remember back during the impeachment, who was the out spoken sex support for Clinton? Larry Flint, the porn-smut magazine publisher himself, whose own daughter is estranged from him and leads an anti-pornography campaign. The idiot-left thought him so wise and credible to speak on who should be president, they flew his lying smutty butt to every single talk show, and news program across the country. I even had liberals telling me how he was going to save Captain Underpants and single handedly wipe out the republican majority... and this was good to their lame-brains.

So what happened? If Smutty-eye'd Larry Flint is qualified to change the make up of congress, and prevent the rule of law for a proven felon... surely Phil Gramm is now qualified to work for the president, right? Isn't that the standard you libs set?

Say it with me... PARTISAN HYPOCRITE! Don't expect anyone to listen to you, when your past shows no credibility at all.
 
Ok, so why is your side bringing up this, I guess from your perspective, irrelevant topic? Lead by example. If it didn't matter before, why does it matter now? Oh wait, this isn't a liberal democrat, so now sex is very important huh?

Say it with me... Partisan Hypocrite.

In fact, the more I think about it, the more hypocritical it is. Remember back during the impeachment, who was the out spoken sex support for Clinton? Larry Flint, the porn-smut magazine publisher himself, whose own daughter is estranged from him and leads an anti-pornography campaign. The idiot-left thought him so wise and credible to speak on who should be president, they flew his lying smutty butt to every single talk show, and news program across the country. I even had liberals telling me how he was going to save Captain Underpants and single handedly wipe out the republican majority... and this was good to their lame-brains.

So what happened? If Smutty-eye'd Larry Flint is qualified to change the make up of congress, and prevent the rule of law for a proven felon... surely Phil Gramm is now qualified to work for the president, right? Isn't that the standard you libs set?

Say it with me... PARTISAN HYPOCRITE! Don't expect anyone to listen to you, when your past shows no credibility at all.

ummm maybe its just me but I posted that I could care less if he did, and said wise investment. I could care less. Partisan? realy? what party do I even support?

And the CLinton thing did one thing for me, it showed me that the Republicans I knew where dead or locked up and the party had been Hijacked by scum who cares more about Bill's Penis. It was a 8 year witch hunt, based not on what was best for America, or on Policy, but just the fact they hated him and the Democracts had one. It was petty and I was far more ashamed of the actions of the right then I ever was that Bill got some head.
 
ummm maybe its just me but I posted that I could care less if he did, and said wise investment. I could care less. Partisan? realy? what party do I even support?

Well, I don't see you having the same sly remarks about democraps as repugs. If you did, I wouldn't be bothered. Having a huge issue with one group, while ignoring another, its very hypocritical, and exactly why our politics are so far gone.

And the CLinton thing did one thing for me, it showed me that the Republicans I knew where dead or locked up and the party had been Hijacked by scum who cares more about Bill's Penis.

This coming from someone who claims to commit adultery with other peoples wives. I do see the connection.

It was a 8 year witch hunt, based not on what was best for America, or on Policy, but just the fact they hated him and the Democracts had one. It was petty and I was far more ashamed of the actions of the right then I ever was that Bill got some head.

Witch hunt? Fact:
Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33
Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61
Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122

The "witch hunt" turned up 47 "witches" then, with another 122 "witches" running for the hills, while 61 little "witches" had minor crimes. Never seen a witch hunt turn up so many.

And what crimes were Clinton associates convicted of?---

Drug trafficking (3)
racketeering, extortion, bribery (4)
tax evasion, kickbacks, embezzlement (2)
fraud (12)
conspiracy (5)
fraudulent loans, illegal gifts (1)
illegal campaign contributions (5)
money laundering (6)
perjury, obstruction of justice.

These "witches" are doing some pretty nasty stuff during this "witch hunt".
It's odd how some people claim to want justice, and then claim that justice is something they are ashamed of.

You do understand that tyranny is when people in office can do anything they want, no matter how illegal, and not face justice, right? You understand that if you did a tiny fraction of what was uncovered, you'd be in jail for life, right?
 
That would be McCain senior economic adviser Phil " a nation of whiners" Gramm. It must have been another case of "Republican family values" at work.

3288842-m.jpg





http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/phil-gramm-may-be-gone-bu_b_112781.html

Yes I saw it. It's been all over the major news channels.

And again by itself there is nothing really wrong with someone's free speech right to produce or sell porn to adults just like there's nothing wrong with being gay.

But when the Republicans Holy Roll all over themselves attacking everyone in their path and then come up with flamingly unethical and/or illegal bazaar homosexual behavior (see Mark Foley & Larry Craig) it just highlights the big scam of their professed convictions.

Personally John McCain's top economics adviser saying that hard working Americans when loosing their homes, gas over $4 bucks a gallon and food costs soaring are just whiners is worse than dabbling in the production of soft core porn.

But the porn does matter as a credibility issue when they try at the same time to play any "Family Values" card against others.
 
Werbung:
I have attacked Dems alot, but there has been less reason to so not as often. And you can name off all you want for convitions of others...I am talking about the personal witch hunt against Clinton, who I never voted for, or liked....that amounted in the end to years or attacks, a ton of money, and nothing but oran from a intern.....in a case started as a look at dealings about a land deal...Wast of my money, distraction from real issues, like OBL who the Right ignored and attacked Bill Clinton for going after becuse they cared more about Monica....

and that quote there was put simply for IloveBoobs , cuz he told me to come here and I knew he would enjoy it.Unless you realy think I am with yoru wife....
 
Back
Top