classical liberalism and capitalism are incompatible
No matter how long your posts, no matter how many times you copy and paste them, it doesn't cover up the reality that your assertions are factually inaccurate.
The phrase
classical liberalism is used in standard academic sources to mean early liberalism, often with particular emphasis on the liberalism of Jacksonian democracy in the 19th Century, which stressed laissez-faire economics and Originalism.
Capitalism and Classical Liberalism are both Individualist ideologies, Socialism is a Collectivist ideology
Capitalism and Classical Liberalism are both based on Individual rights, Socialism is based on Collective Rights.
Capitalism and Classical Liberalism recognize rights as natural, negative rights, that exist independent of government, Socialism recognizes rights as social, positive rights, granted by government or society.
Capitalism and Classical Liberalism both support free markets with no government intrusion, Socialism supports government intrusion on the markets.
Capitalism and Classical Liberalism both support property rights, Socialism supports the abolition of property rights.
There simply are no conflicts between Capitalism and Classical Liberalism, while Socialism isn't compatible with either of them.