Reply to thread

Using an "experts" opinion in a debate is an "appeal to authority" which is considered a logical fallacy.  However, if the expert did scientific research/testing to determine if there were explosives involved, then the findings could be considered as to their merit.  Just his opinion means nothing.


Research that would prove if explosives contributed/caused the collapse would be to test the rubble for the presence of explosive residue; something that no one has done.  Non-engineers, laypeople looking at a video has no scientific merit.


Back
Top