Guess I should have done this one first.
You only look for evidence to support your position, not for evidence in opposition to it. Too many people more educated, and brighter, then you have tried to disprove the Bible, and ended up believers instead. People such as Sturgeon, and C.S. Lewis.
Now, I never said I believed what ws easy. I said I find it harder to believe there is no God. You just want to spin it your way.
ALL those laws against gay people? The only ones I know of were moral laws, and had to do with sexual activity. Other actions were not based on the law, just on a persons personal beliefs, such as an employer, and the left, secularists (Atheists), and other groups then enacted court cases, and laws, to benefit them at the expense of the individuals right to make their own hiring decisions, or renting of a house. There is nothing in the Constitution that demands one not be a bigot.
A million women? Give it as break. And the crusades was started by an RCC Pope, not by Christians. Then too, do you think the crusades were not justified to a point? Do you not think that the Crusades saved Europe? When the Islamic troll was posting, and referred to building on skulls, he must have been referring to the Muslim Tamarlane who required that the heads of Christians be placed at the city gate of which a reported 90,000 were piled at Baghdad.
History is most often rewritten by the left wing as we can see in the modern texbooks.
Of course you are referring to marriage a right homosexuals are not denied. No male homosexual is denied the right to marry a woman, nor is a lesbian denied the right to marry a man. What you want is a special right where homosexuality is determined to be equal to that of heterosexuality.
Here again is an example of your perversion of history, and current events. In 1963 Atheist Maureen O'Hair pursuaded the USSC to enact a ruling that had the result of preventing prayer in schools; mentioning God at graduation ceremonies; setting the stage for Atheists to prevent the Christian from displaying nativity scenes, or the ten commandments, on public grounds; removing crosses from public cemetaries, State flags, etc. Then there is the teaching of evolution, under power of the law, which denies the existence of God. Also is the teaching of homosexuality as a normal lifestyle, under power of law, which denies the morality of God. All of this is directed mainly at the young of the country thus teaching the youth of the country a belief that is contrary to the belief of their parents, and if they reject that teaching they are suspended from school, given a failing grade, etc. Lawsuits have even been brought forward to try and force Christian groups to hire those who they believe are in direct opposition to their beliefs such as Atheists, witches, etc.
Christians all over the country have rejected the actions of Phelps, and do not consider him to be legitimate. Robertson has made some comments which are objectionable, yet the majority of his teachings are based on biblical principles, and his charity groups have done more good for the poor in foreign countries, as well as the US, then any secular group, or the Atheist groups.
Have you heard of the Patriot Guard? It is a group of veterans that has been formed to prevent those of whom you would approve from disturbing the funerals of fallen soldiers which you would not consider the equivalent of a Fred Phelps.
As to judgement, there is nothing in the Bible to prevent one from judging another in matters of this life, only in the afterlife. Paul made that quite clear in 1Cor. 5:3, and in many other verses. Also in Leviticus, Deuteronomy, etc., the rules are given upon how to judge. For one to claim that a Christian has not the right, or the obligation, to judge in ludicrous on the facr of it, and is only used by others to mock, or ridicule, the Christian since you have no understanding of God, and would wish for those who do to just set in a corner, and shut up. Kind of like the Romans of olden times, if left to your own devices you would persecute the Christian to the same end.
As I have pointed out, it is not the Christian that is trying to force anyone to believe anything. As to actions, the country is slowly, and lately more rapidly, sliding in your amoral direction, and we can see the results on the school grounds, in the streets, and in government as a whole.