Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
I simply can't prove or disprove. I don't particularly see a God as you see him, but something exists. Be God a name for the laws which glue us together, an intelligence in a manner that is so far removed from our own that seeing it as an intelligence is impossible, perhaps there really is a hidden realm with a cloud kingdom and 12 gods sitting in thrones controlling the mass thought and movements of societies. Who can truly say? Not I. Is christianity the truth? Is Islam? Is Anything? Are we actually here as we see ourselves or is this 3 dimensional space and laws that govern it simply the manner in which our minds perceive something that is nothing like what we believe? Who knows. All I know is that the laws of physics as we understand them seem pretty good. Does this prove or disprove that a God created the universe? I think it does neither. There is no way to prove any religious idea, and religious story; there is inversely no method of disproving them. The problem with many religious ideals is that it is an interpretation of something written long ago under unknown circumstance. The allegorical methods used then are all but lost to us today, interpretation is bound to be a bit shy of the mark. Evolution? Intelligent design? If the laws of the universe are considered a pseudointellect then how is Evolution not a design that follows an intelligence? To argue anything that requires faith is due to fail, on both sides of the debate. Be your way, I'll be mine. What I believe is as valid as your beliefs. That being said, I really don't like the poll missing the "I have no manner of deciding," choice. I must stop for a moment and point out that there are many flavors of all religion, there are also many flavors of nonreligion. Atheists come in as many forms as there are sects of christianity. You have those who simply never even consider the why of we are here. You have those who have searched and found nothing. And you have most notably the loud and often obnoxious Atheists who feel the need to chip away at the faith of others with as little fact arming them as those trying to push their faith upon people. You can't do it. Simply cannot deny with absolute certainty something that has no empirical form. This type of atheist, the angry atheist, has some deep rooted illwill towards religion en mass. I'm not sure each persons particular reasoning, but it moves nothing forward and typically is a pointless shelling. If you debate or argue with anger, is not being objective.What I can however argue is peoples application of interpretations. Often these conflict readily with logic, humanity, and often even morality as I see it. This is all open for fire.
I simply can't prove or disprove. I don't particularly see a God as you see him, but something exists. Be God a name for the laws which glue us together, an intelligence in a manner that is so far removed from our own that seeing it as an intelligence is impossible, perhaps there really is a hidden realm with a cloud kingdom and 12 gods sitting in thrones controlling the mass thought and movements of societies. Who can truly say? Not I. Is christianity the truth? Is Islam? Is Anything? Are we actually here as we see ourselves or is this 3 dimensional space and laws that govern it simply the manner in which our minds perceive something that is nothing like what we believe? Who knows. All I know is that the laws of physics as we understand them seem pretty good. Does this prove or disprove that a God created the universe? I think it does neither. There is no way to prove any religious idea, and religious story; there is inversely no method of disproving them. The problem with many religious ideals is that it is an interpretation of something written long ago under unknown circumstance. The allegorical methods used then are all but lost to us today, interpretation is bound to be a bit shy of the mark. Evolution? Intelligent design? If the laws of the universe are considered a pseudointellect then how is Evolution not a design that follows an intelligence? To argue anything that requires faith is due to fail, on both sides of the debate. Be your way, I'll be mine. What I believe is as valid as your beliefs. That being said, I really don't like the poll missing the "I have no manner of deciding," choice.
I must stop for a moment and point out that there are many flavors of all religion, there are also many flavors of nonreligion. Atheists come in as many forms as there are sects of christianity. You have those who simply never even consider the why of we are here. You have those who have searched and found nothing. And you have most notably the loud and often obnoxious Atheists who feel the need to chip away at the faith of others with as little fact arming them as those trying to push their faith upon people. You can't do it. Simply cannot deny with absolute certainty something that has no empirical form. This type of atheist, the angry atheist, has some deep rooted illwill towards religion en mass. I'm not sure each persons particular reasoning, but it moves nothing forward and typically is a pointless shelling. If you debate or argue with anger, is not being objective.
What I can however argue is peoples application of interpretations. Often these conflict readily with logic, humanity, and often even morality as I see it. This is all open for fire.
