Reply to thread

In any branch of thinking (i.e. science, theology, philosophy, etc) would think that any proof would be evidence but I fail to see how any evidence would need to be proof. But I am open to seeing the simplest dictionary definition or to be informed of a situation in which whatever evidence of some sort is provided it is then proof (bad sentence. sorry). As far as I am concerned, in the sciences as elsewhere, evidence supports a notion but is not proof unless it is strong enough to abolish all doubt.


I also fail to see any ontological argument that is sound enough to be proof.


Back
Top