Reply to thread

Conflict or debate, call it how you like. I've told you that I am arguing against the concept of a god as defined by christianity and you are ignoring that. That is what is total rubbish and I'm here to say so, not to go further and imagine a god in some other concept which has nothing to do with the topic of discussion as far as I can tell.


One can deny a god because there is no evidence to support that a god used a tool of any sort to create life. Indeed science has a perfectly plausible explanation for how life may have sprung up unaided by any god. That is still a theory but it is a much more acceptable theory than the theory of a god of some sort initiating life. Do you have any evidence to support your theory? I have abundant evidence to support mine if you want to hear it. I suggest your read Richard Dawkins', 'The Ancestor's Tale', and save me the bother. You would learn more much quicker that way.


Briefly, if you choose to get into some other concept of a god, you would need to reconcile the fact that a god couldn't creat himself/herself/itself. We need to rely on science to tell us sometime in the future when the human brain has developed enough to understand such concepts. For now it's over both your head and mine too.


Where do you want to go with this topic? I will continue with you as long as you are willing to be reasonable and accept ideas. If not then I have better things to do.


Back
Top