Reply to thread

No, I pointed out that your arguments were against the Christian god, not against the concept of god.  The challenge issued in the title of the thread is to prove that god doesn't exist.  It doesn't say anything about any particular god.


Of course, you can't prove the non existence of the Christian god, either, as that would entail proving a negative.  The best you have been able to do so far is to show that the young earth and Bible as literal history ideas are bunk.  I think most of us would agree that they are bunk, whether or not we believe in the Christian god, some other god, or no god at all.


 


Here, again, you are using the idea that evolution necessarily happened all on its own.  There is no evidence at all that it did (or didn't).  You are trying to use science to argue a point that is in the realm of metaphysics.  It is an apples and oranges kind of argument.


Once again, there is no conflict between science and the concept of god, nor between evolution and a belief in Christianity, only between science and some people's interpretation of ancient writings.


As for the origin of life, that is another matter.  Science has never demonstrated abiogenesis, the ability of non living matter to produce life.  For life to have sprung up without intelligent guidance, it would have had to come from spontaneous generation, a concept that has never been shown to be even possible. 





If you want to set yourself the more conservative goal of proving the non existence of the Christian god, then, by all means, let's see your argument.


Back
Top