Of course I am right.
Sigh
You do not wish to accept the purely philosophical explanation of sw85. How about one based on einsteins special and general relativity?
Everyone knows that time is a lorentz-invariant quantity, no? It can be made to go slow or fast depending on the observer's reference frame, no? In fact, it is merely an effect of a particular space-time geometry.
And what do you suppose an observer from a reference frame that is made to move very close to the speed of light be seeing in this particular reference frame, hmmm? Is that not like looking at us in fast forward? If one were to sufficiently curve space-time, isn't the net effect exactly the same?
When einstein posited the impossibility of simulteneity, the consequence should have been obvious instantly -- what is the future for one reference frame could very well be the past in another.
Unequivocal fact, indeed!
I already have. SW85 even took the time to present it in moronese, for your benefit, it seems.
Again I have.
A space-time singularity is an entity that has no measurable quantity, hence non-physical. According to all big bang cosmological theories, it is the starting point from which the universe came into existence.
Hence a non-physical entity itself, becoming a physical entity.
It is not my fault that you don't understand, is it?
