My point, of course, was that you can't prove the existence of god any more that Dawks, or anyone else, can prove the non existence of god. I'm not peddling agnosticism, or any other "ism", actually. I stated my opinion on the matter clearly, and then admitted that I can't prove it any more than you can.
But, when you make statements like:
which you constantly do, of course, merely says to the world, "I have no more arguments, and so I've stooped to the level of personal insult."
And, I can't help but make one more observation:
If talking to Dawki merely serves to lower one's IQ,
and if you have been carrying on a debate with him for page after page, well, then
given your own premise, then the conclusion is obvious to all.
But, then, since I don't subscribe to the original premise, neither can I agree with the obvious conclusion.
