Reply to thread

Why do you people insist on going back to this 'can't prove a negative' nonsense.


When one proves the existence of a NECESSARY BEING, its non-existence is automatically REFUTED.


Is that logical enough for you? Or do you feel smart stating axiomatic statements using defective language?




Do you expect me to suffer his insults quietly?


He is a bigot -- which wouldn't have been as bad if he had some measure of intelligence to back it up.




Is it even possible to make up your mind?


You claim that I have stooped to the level of personal insults in one breath and claim that I am carrying on a debate in another.


So, which is it?


Back
Top