Everyting that exists is a "being"? If you are not positing an anthropomorphic "god" for which there is no proof, then we're good to go.
The proof of cosmological argument is simply the furthest reach we can currently make, there is nothing inherently "ultimate" in our cosmologies.
So? You got a point with this?
No particular evidence of a "god". Things are the way they are, we can't prove one way or another what made them that way and postulating an anthropomorphic "god" is unsupportable. That we may have some of the attributes that we assign to "god" doesn't mean that "god" exists or that even if "god" did that we would be correct in our assignment of human qualities to It.
Good as far as you go, but when you phone me up and announce that "god" moved the chair, then you are on shaky ground. "Something" doesn't necessarily equate to "god".
Well, I try to keep an open mind on these things. Existentialism can be slippery.
Why then do you not attribute gravity to an anthropomorphic "god" source? I just don't think you've given anything but semantic froth to justify an anthropomorphic "god" as the ultimate source of our existence. Maybe a self-aware computer program made the being you call "god" and then "god" made us, that computer program would be the next step out towards our ultimate source, but something must have started the computer program... on and on we go with no requirement for a manlike "god".
