Reply to thread

The improbable is still possible, no?




This is nonsense.


You eliminate a possibility by showing the defect in an argument -- either by logic or demonstration.


You haven't done any of that, have you? Therefore, the conclusion stands.


 


Just like this statment here. What the hell has your opinion have to do with logical proof?


You do not think the proof is true within its domain of logical inquiry. Sadly, you have not provided any logical refutation -- merely an assertion said over and over again.




Why would you think I don't like the word froth? If you have some intimate knowledge of froth, then by all means, mention it as much as you wish. Just so long as you do not cloud your rational judgement by it.


Back
Top