Reply to thread

Indeed, but as we yet we  have not ruled out the possible, probable, or even the improbable, so why jump to conclusions?  We have no proof except your antics in semantics.



A wild conclusion is just that: a wild conclusion.  No proof either way doesn't support a wild conclusion.



There's nothing to refute, you made a chain of logic and drew a conclusion, you have not shown the validity of the initial assumptions.


Back
Top